The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bedside Cognitive Screening Instruments: A Critical Assessment
Abstract
Bedside cognitive screening instruments are used increasingly in clinical and research settings to detect cognitive impairment and to quantify its severity. The authors review the five most frequently cited bedside screening tests that use an interview format and require brief administration times: the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, Kahn's Mental Status Questionnaire, and the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. The tests all have adequate inter-rater reliability, and adequate test-retest reliability has been established for three of the tests. All of the tests show close correspondence with clinical diagnoses of delirium and dementia and are useful for the diagnosis and quantification of these syndromes. However, there is currently no evidence that the tests increase the level of diagnostic accuracy achieved through clinical examination alone. All of the tests have substantial false-negative rates, with false-negative errors frequent among patients with focal lesions, particularly of the right hemisphere. False-positive errors may be more common among patients with less education and lower socioeconomic status. The tests reviewed do not detect many types of cognitive deficit that may bear critically on differential diagnosis and case management. Suggestions are given for further research on the current measures and for the development of new screening tests that would meet a broader range of clinical purposes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Mini‐Mental State Examination: A Comprehensive Review
Tombaugh, T. N., & McIntyre, N. J. (1992) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x · Cited by 5,152
Inouye, S. K. (1994) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(94)90011-6 · Cited by 593
(1999) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.159.5.ats2-99 · Cited by 425
The Mini-Mental State Examination in the Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
Galasko, D., Klauber, M. R., Hofstetter, C. R., Salmon, D. P., Lasker, B., & Thal, L. J. (1990) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1990.00530010061020 · Cited by 337
Psychiatric Disorder in the General Hospital
Mayou, R., & Hawton, K. (1986) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.149.2.172 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- NELSON, A., FOGEL, B. S., & FAUST, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
- Published
- 1986-02
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 73-83
- ISSN
- 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067300933
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bedside Cognitive Screening Instruments: A Critical Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005053-198602000-00002
- The paper
- NELSON, A., FOGEL, B. S., & FAUST, D. (1986). Bedside Cognitive Screening Instruments: A Critical Assessment. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198602000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.