The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recovery style from mental illness and long-term outcome.
Abstract
Integration and sealing over have been identified as clinically distinct recovery styles from schizophrenia. Specific definitions and scales of these styles were applied reliably to 231 patients from the Chestnut Lodge follow-up study at long-term outcome (15 year average). Data were analyzed for the entire sample and for diagnostic subgroups: schizophrenia, schizoaffective and unipolar affective disorders, and schizotypal and borderline personality disorders. Results find that integration and sealing over are strongly correlated with functional outcome. While linked somewhat to type of psychopathology, these styles are best conceived as enduring personality trait characteristics in the nature of predictors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“meaning-making styles in psychosis are not static but can change over time (58–61).”
From Making meaning of trauma in psychosis (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“a recovery style directed at turning toward and integrating experiences predicts better functioning on the long term”
From Making meaning of trauma in psychosis (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Weeghel, J., van Zelst, C., Boertien, D., & Hasson-Ohayon, I. (2019) · Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.1037/prj0000356 · Cited by 314
Braehler, C., Gumley, A., Harper, J., Wallace, S., Norrie, J., & Gilbert, P. (2013) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12009 · Cited by 294
Personality and psychopathology: working toward the bigger picture.
Krueger, R. F., & Tackett, J. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.17.2.109.23986 · Cited by 282
“High levels of systematic covariance (comorbidity) are seen not only within, but also across Axes I and II (Fabrega et al., 1992; McGlashan, 1987; Skodol et al., 1999).”
Longden, E., Madill, A., & Waterman, M. G. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0025995 · Cited by 248
Berry, K., Barrowclough, C., & Wearden, A. (2007) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.006 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- McGLASHAN, T. H.
- Corresponding author
- McGLASHAN, THOMAS H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 681-685
- ISSN
- 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066056799
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, integration, long-term outcomes, functional outcome, schizoaffective disorder, unipolar affective disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, personality traits, prognostic factors
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Awareness, Mental Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Personality, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenic Psychology, Schizotypal Personality Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
