Cited by 161Family Caregiving in Mental IllnessNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

THE EXPERIENCE OF PROVIDING CARE TO RELATIVES WITH CHRONIC MENTAL ILLNESS

VELTMAN, ALBINA, CAMERON, JILL I., STEWART, DONNA E.·2002·The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Abstract

Research on family caregivers of mentally ill relatives has historically focused on negative aspects of caregiving, often described as caregiver burden. The authors document caregivers' perspectives on both the negative and positive aspects of caregiving. A qualitative approach was used. Data collection involved 20 in-depth, audiotaped, semistructured interviews focusing on caregivers' positive and negative personal experiences with caregiving to a relative with mental illness. Caregivers reported common negative impacts but also beneficial effects, such as feelings of gratification, love, and pride. Main themes included stigma, systems issues, life lessons learned, and love and caring for the ill relative. This study counterbalances the predominantly negative consequences previously reported and adds to the emerging literature on positive aspects of caregiving. Mental health professionals need to help caregiving families make choices to improve their challenging situations and identify the rewards of caregiving, and to advocate for increased systemic supports to ease caregiver burden.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005053-200202000-00008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many carers report positive caregiving experiences, including feelings of satisfaction and improved self-esteem.

    “Thus, we know that many carers report positive caregiving experiences, including feelings of satisfaction and improved self-esteem.36,37”

    From Cognitive model of caregiving in psychosis (2010) · cites this paper as [36]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VELTMAN, A., CAMERON, J. I., & STEWART, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
2002-02
Volume
190
Issue
2
Pages
108-114
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087712505
Cited by
161
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
family caregivers, chronic mental illness, caregiver burden, positive aspects of caregiving, stigma, life lessons, family support networks, caregiver experiences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Prejudice, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review