The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mortality Risk After Hip Fracture
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the mortality risk following hip fracture and identify factors predictive of increased mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Tertiary care orthopaedic hospital. BACKGROUND: Approximately 250,000 hip fractures occur annually in the United States. The greatest mortality risk following hip fracture has been demonstrated to be within the first 6 months of fracture, and some studies report that the risk approaches expected mortality after 6 months. However, more recent studies have demonstrated that an increased risk of mortality may persist for several years postfracture. The purpose of this study was to assess the excess mortality associated with hip fracture at up to 2 years postinjury. METHODS: All patients with a hip fracture who were admitted to our institution over a 10-year period were evaluated. Criteria for inclusion included: Caucasian, age 65 or older, previously ambulatory, and home dwelling. Patients were followed prospectively to determine the mortality risk associated with hip fracture over a 2-year follow-up period. Mortality was compared to a standardized population and standardized mortality ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-six patients met the inclusion criteria and were included. The mortality risk was highest within the first 3 months following fracture, with standardized mortality ratios approaching that of the control population by two years. Patients age 65-84 had higher mortality risk when compared with patients age > or =85. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was predictive of increased mortality risk in younger patients, with these patients having triple the mortality risk when compared to the reference population at 2-year follow-up. More elderly patients had minimal excess mortality associated with hip fracture at 1- and 2-year follow-up, regardless of ASA classification. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that hip fracture is not associated with significant excess mortality amongst patients older than age 85. Amongst younger patients, however, those with ASA classifications of 3 or 4 have significant excess mortality following hip fracture that persists up to 2 years after injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review
Abrahamsen, B., van Staa, T., Ariely, R., Olson, M., & Cooper, C. (2009) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-009-0920-3 · Cited by 1,079
Kulminski, A. M., Ukraintseva, S. V., Kulminskaya, I. V., Arbeev, K. G., Land, K., & Yashin, A. I. (2008) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01656.x · Cited by 434
Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models
Keyak, J. H., Kaneko, T. S., Tehranzadeh, J., & Skinner, H. B. (2005) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000164400.37905.22 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Richmond, J., Aharonoff, G. B., Zuckerman, J. D., & Koval, K. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-56
- ISSN
- 0890-5339 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986268411
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality Risk After Hip Fracture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005131-200301000-00008
- The paper
- Richmond, J., Aharonoff, G. B., Zuckerman, J. D., & Koval, K. J. (2003). Mortality Risk After Hip Fracture. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200301000-00008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.