The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PROBLEMS WITH INITIAL GLASGOW COMA SCALE ASSESSMENT CAUSED BY PREHOSPITAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH HEAD INJURIES: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SURVEY
Abstract
The rapid treatment of patients with a severe head injury often includes prehospital intubation and sedation, but such measures compromise the ability to obtain an accurate Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score in the emergency department (ED). Major head injury centers in the United States were surveyed to determine how they currently obtain initial GCS scores when these or other complicating circumstances exist. A two-page questionnaire was distributed to seven members of the trauma team at 17 major neurotrauma centers in which they were asked who usually determines the initial GCS scores, where they are assessed, and when. Respondents were also asked how they assign scores for patients who received medications or were intubated before arrival at their hospital and how they score patients who are hypotensive, hypoxic, or have severe periorbital swelling. Most centers assess the initial GCS scores in their ED within 1 hour after the discovery of the patient by prehospital personnel. Most neurosurgeons said that hypotension and hypoxia are stabilized before the initial GCS scores are assessed and that intubated patients receive a non-numerical designation. But the majority of non-neurosurgical ED personnel said that they determine the initial GCS scores immediately after arrival of the patients in their department, regardless of hypoxia or hypotension. There also were significant discrepancies between attending neurosurgeons and their residents with regard to who actually assesses the GCS scores and how the scores are determined for patients who have received neuromuscular paralysis or sedation or who have severe periorbital swelling. In addition, 20% of attending neurosurgeons and 24% of non-neurosurgical ED personnel reported using the worst, rather than the best, GCS sum score when motor or eye-opening abilities are asymmetrical. This survey revealed important inter-center and intra-center differences of opinion regarding how the initial GCS scores are obtained. Such differences make it difficult to interpret the results of head injury studies that use the initial GCS scores to describe injury severity. The results of this survey emphasize the need for nationally recognized policies for determining the initial GCS scores that account for contemporary prehospital management of patients with severe head injuries.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Classification of injury based on GCS has limitations including inter-observer reliability, timing after injury, reduced meaning after repeated injury and assessment, as well as use of medications at the scene of the accident potentially altering scoring [16,17,18].”
From Update of Endocrine Dysfunction following Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury (2015) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The European Brain Injury Consortium Survey of Head Injuries
Murray, G. D., Teasdale, G. M., Braakman, R., Cohadon, F., Dearden, M., Iannotti, F., Karimi, A., Lapierre, F., Maas, A. I. R., Öhman, J. E., et al. (1999) · Acta Neurochirurgica · doi:10.1007/s007010050292 · Cited by 389
“The time points and clinical data chosen as a basis for categorising severity of head injury in previous studies have varied considerably [22].”
BackgroundMarmarou, A., Lü, J., Butcher, I., McHugh, G. S., Murray, G. D., Steyerberg, E. W., Mushkudiani, N. A., Choi, S. C., & Maas, A. I. R. (2007) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2006.0029 · Cited by 357
“However the current day practice of early sedation and paralysis also compromises the ability to obtain an accurate motor score on admission (Marion and Carlier, 1994).”
Hypoxemia and Arterial Hypotension at the Accident Scene in Head Injury
Stocchetti, N., Furlan, A., & Volta, F. (1996) · doi:10.1097/00005373-199605000-00014 · Cited by 317
Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale Score: Motor Score Alone Is a Better Predictor
Healey, C., Osler, T. M., Rogers, F. B., et al. (2003) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000058130.30490.5d · Cited by 311
Sternbach, G. L. (2000) · Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0736-4679(00)00182-7 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Marion, D. W., & Carlier, P. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- ORCID
- Marion, Donald W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-95
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965352548
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p20ns030318-03)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS 1P20NS30318-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- Glasgow Coma Scale, severe traumatic brain injury, prehospital intubation, hypotension, hypoxia, periorbital swelling, inter-center variability, injury severity assessment
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Protocols, Data Collection, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Service, Hospital, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Neurosurgery, Patient Admission, Personnel, Hospital, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Trauma Centers, Traumatology, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Glasgow Coma Scale, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review