CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 231Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PROBLEMS WITH INITIAL GLASGOW COMA SCALE ASSESSMENT CAUSED BY PREHOSPITAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH HEAD INJURIES: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SURVEY

Marion, Donald W., Carlier, Patricia M.·1994·The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
DOI 10.1097/00005373-199401000-00014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The rapid treatment of patients with a severe head injury often includes prehospital intubation and sedation, but such measures compromise the ability to obtain an accurate Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score in the emergency department (ED). Major head injury centers in the United States were surveyed to determine how they currently obtain initial GCS scores when these or other complicating circumstances exist. A two-page questionnaire was distributed to seven members of the trauma team at 17 major neurotrauma centers in which they were asked who usually determines the initial GCS scores, where they are assessed, and when. Respondents were also asked how they assign scores for patients who received medications or were intubated before arrival at their hospital and how they score patients who are hypotensive, hypoxic, or have severe periorbital swelling. Most centers assess the initial GCS scores in their ED within 1 hour after the discovery of the patient by prehospital personnel. Most neurosurgeons said that hypotension and hypoxia are stabilized before the initial GCS scores are assessed and that intubated patients receive a non-numerical designation. But the majority of non-neurosurgical ED personnel said that they determine the initial GCS scores immediately after arrival of the patients in their department, regardless of hypoxia or hypotension. There also were significant discrepancies between attending neurosurgeons and their residents with regard to who actually assesses the GCS scores and how the scores are determined for patients who have received neuromuscular paralysis or sedation or who have severe periorbital swelling. In addition, 20% of attending neurosurgeons and 24% of non-neurosurgical ED personnel reported using the worst, rather than the best, GCS sum score when motor or eye-opening abilities are asymmetrical. This survey revealed important inter-center and intra-center differences of opinion regarding how the initial GCS scores are obtained. Such differences make it difficult to interpret the results of head injury studies that use the initial GCS scores to describe injury severity. The results of this survey emphasize the need for nationally recognized policies for determining the initial GCS scores that account for contemporary prehospital management of patients with severe head injuries.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005373-199401000-00014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 231

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Marion, D. W., & Carlier, P. M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
ORCID
Marion, Donald W.
Venue
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
1994-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
89-95
ISSN
0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/00005373-199401000-00014
OpenAlex
W1965352548
Cited by
226
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p20ns030318-03)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS 1P20NS30318-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
Glasgow Coma Scale, severe traumatic brain injury, prehospital intubation, hypotension, hypoxia, periorbital swelling, inter-center variability, injury severity assessment
MeSH terms
Clinical Protocols, Data Collection, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Service, Hospital, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Neurosurgery, Patient Admission, Personnel, Hospital, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Trauma Centers, Traumatology, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Glasgow Coma Scale, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review