Cited by 266Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

Lateral pharyngoplasty: A new treatment for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome

Cahali, Michel B.·2003·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objective: The role of the lateral pharyngeal muscular walls in the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is crucial. My objective is to describe a surgical procedure for splinting the lateral pharyngeal walls in patients with OSAHS and report the initial results. Study Design: Prospective randomized pilot study performed in an academic tertiary center as part of a doctoral thesis. Patients and Methods: Ten adults with OSAHS, originally selected for treatment with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, underwent the lateral pharyngoplasty procedure, which consists of a microdissection of the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle within the tonsillar fossa, sectioning of this muscle, and suturing of the created laterally based flap of that muscle to the same‐side palatoglossus muscle. In addition, a palatopharyngeal Z‐plasty is performed to prevent retropalatal collapse. Results: Lateral pharyngoplasty improved sleep and daytime symptoms related to OSAHS. After at least 6 months of follow‐up, the median apnea‐hypopnea index decreased from 41.2 to 9.5 (P = .009) and the median total sleep time spent in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and in stages 3 plus 4 non‐REM sleep increased from 14.1% to 22.1% (P = .059) and from 5.3% to 16.3% (P = .037), respectively. Also, there was statistically significant improvement in snoring, daytime sleepiness, and overall impact of the disease on quality of life. Swallowing disturbances lasted a median of 14.5 days after the surgeries, and all patients returned to normal subjective swallowing function in the follow‐up. Conclusions: Lateral pharyngoplasty is a safe and straightforward approach to lateral pharyngeal muscles and has produced appreciable benefits for OSAHS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005537-200311000-00020

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cahali, M. B.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Cahali, Michel B.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11
Volume
113
Issue
11
Pages
1961-1968
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2038108904
Cited by
266
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, apnea-hypopnea index, REM sleep, snoring, daytime sleepiness
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Palate, Soft, Pharynx, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures, Surgical Flaps, Uvula, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review