Cited by 163Survey Methodology and NonresponseHealthcare Policy and ManagementMedical Coding and Health Information

The Validity of Self-reported Physician Utilization Measures

Cleary, Paul D., Jette, Alan M.·1984·Medical Care

Abstract

Respondents' reports of outpatient medical care use in the preceding year are compared with actual utilization. The authors examine the predictors of the discrepancy between reported and actual utilization as well as the extent to which reporting error biases models of utilization behavior. The average reporting error in this study is relatively small, but the impact of biased reporting on prediction models can be substantial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005650-198409000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-reported health care use shows high agreement with medical records and administrative claims.

    “However, the validity of self-reported health care use has been replicated in a range of samples, where self-reported health care use shows high agreement with medical records and administrative claims (46 -48).”

    From Purpose in life and use of preventive health care services (2014) · cites this paper as [46]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cleary, P. D., & Jette, A. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Cleary, Paul D.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
1984-09
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
796-803
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998942434
Cited by
163
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
outpatient care, error reporting, validity, measurement bias, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Data Collection, Female, Group Practice, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Socioeconomic Factors, Statistics as Topic, Utilization Review

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review