The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adequacy and Duration of Antidepressant Treatment in Primary Care
Abstract
Among a sample of 119 distressed high-utilizers of primary care, 45% of patients evaluated by a psychiatrist as needing antidepressant treatment had been treated in the year before the examination. However, only 11% of the patients needing antidepressants had received adequate dosage and duration of pharmacotherapy. In the year following the intervention, study patients whose physicians were advised regarding treatment during a psychiatric consultation were more likely to receive antidepressant medications (52.7%) relative to a randomized control group (36.1%). However, the intervention did not significantly increase the provision of adequate antidepressant therapy (37.1% vs 27.9%). Among study patients using antidepressants, patient characteristics did not differentiate patients who received adequate dosage and duration of antidepressant medications from those who did not. Analysis of data on the duration of antidepressant therapy for all health maintenance organization enrollees initiating use of antidepressants showed that only 20% of patients who had been given prescriptions for first-generation antidepressants (amitriptyline, imipramine, or doxepin) filled four or more prescriptions in the following six months, compared to 34% of patients who had prescriptions for newer antidepressants (nortriptyline, desipramine, trazodone and fluoxetine). Experimental research evaluating whether these newer medications (with more favorable side effect profiles) improve adherence, and thereby patient outcome, is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
Lifetime Prevalence of Specific Psychiatric Disorders in Three Sites
Robins, L. N. (1984) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790210031005 · Cited by 2,550
The Functioning and Well-being of Depressed Patients: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells, K. B. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430070062031 · Cited by 2,130
Treatment of Depression in General Practice
Johnson, D. A. W. (1973) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5857.18 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Risk Factors for Depression Among Elderly Community Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Cole, M. G., & Dendukuri, N. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1147 · Cited by 1,368
Wells, K. B., Sherbourne, C., Schoenbaum, M., Duan, N., Meredith, L., Unützer, J., Miranda, J., Carney, M. F., & Rubenstein, L. V. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.2.212 · Cited by 1,021
Hirschfeld, R. M. A. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540280071036 · Cited by 895
A Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
Katon, W. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830100072009 · Cited by 835
Self-citationNonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenomenon
Barsky, A. J. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.5.622 · Cited by 784
Metadata
- Authors
- Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Lin, E., Bush, T., & Ormel, J.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-76
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996695042
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adequacy and Duration of Antidepressant Treatment in Primary Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005650-199201000-00007
- The paper
- Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Lin, E., Bush, T., & Ormel, J. (1992). Adequacy and Duration of Antidepressant Treatment in Primary Care. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199201000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.