Screening for High Utilizing Somatizing Patients Using a Prediction Rule Derived From the Management Information System of an HMO: A Preliminary Study
Abstract
Background Somatization is a common, costly problem with great morbidity, but there has been no effective screening method to identify these patients and target them for treatment. Objectives We tested a hypothesis that we could identify high utilizing somatizing patients from a management information system (MIS) by total number of visits and what we termed "somatization potential," the percentage of visits for which ICD-9 primary diagnosis codes represented disorders in the musculoskeletal, nervous, or gastrointestinal systems or ill-defined complaints. Methods We identified 883 high users from the MIS of a large staff model HMO as those having six or more visits during the year studied (65th percentile). A physician rater, without knowledge of hypotheses and predictors, then reviewed the medical records of these patients and identified somatizing patients (n = 122) and nonsomatizing patients (n = 761). In two-thirds of the population (the derivation set), we used logistic regression to refine our hypothesis and identify predictors of somatization available from the MIS: demographic data, all medical encounters, and primary diagnoses made by usual care physicians (ICD-9 codes). We then tested our prediction model in the remaining one-third of the population (the validation set) to validate its usefulness. Results The derivation set contained the following significant correlates of somatization: gender, total number of visits, and percent of visits with somatization potentia…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The somatisation potential classifier was developed on persons with higher utilisation levels, whereas this study's cohort included persons with normal utilisation levels.
“Additionally, the classifier was developed on persons with higher utilisation levels, and our cohort included persons with normal utilisation levels.”
Cites
Somatization: the concept and its clinical application
(1988) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.145.11.1358 · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
Smith, G. R. (1986) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.146.1.69 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Randomized Trial of a Depression Management Program in High Utilizers of Medical Care
Katzelnick, D. J. (2000) · Archives of Family Medicine · doi:10.1001/archfami.9.4.345 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Primary care physicians treat somatization
Smith, R. C., Gardiner, J. C., Luo, Z., Schooley, S., Lamerato, L., & Rost, K. (2009) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0992-y · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationRay, L., Outten, B., & Gottlieb, K. (2020) · International Journal of Circumpolar Health · doi:10.1080/22423982.2019.1705048 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Somatic visits Visits at any SCF location on the somatisation potential list from Smith and colleagues: ill-defined symptoms and disorders in the musculoskeletal, nervous or gastrointestinal systems [32].”
Background
- Authors
- Smith, R. C., Gardiner, J. C., Armatti, S., Johnson, M., Lyles, J. S., Given, C. W., Lein, C., Given, B., Goddeeris, J., Korban, E., Haddad, R., & Kanj, M.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Robert C.
- Lyles, Judith S.
- Haddad, Robert
- Kanj, Mohammed
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 968-978
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2331007593
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- somatization, chronic pain, screening, prediction model, management information systems, ICD-9 codes, health maintenance organizations, primary care utilization, musculoskeletal disorders, gastrointestinal diseases, neurological disorders, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Health Maintenance Organizations, Humans, Male, Management Information Systems, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Office Visits, Sensitivity and Specificity, Somatoform Disorders, United States, Utilization Review, Logistic Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review