The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiattribute and Single-Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is a generic multiattribute preference-based measure of health status and health-related quality of life that is widely used as an outcome measure in clinical studies, in population health surveys, in the estimation of quality-adjusted life years, and in economic evaluations. HUI3 consists of eight attributes (or dimensions) of health status: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain with 5 or 6 levels per attribute, varying from highly impaired to normal. OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to present a multiattribute utility function and eight single-attribute utility functions for the HUI3 system based on community preferences. STUDY DESIGN: Two preference surveys were conducted. One, the modeling survey, collected preference scores for the estimation of the utility functions. The other, the direct survey, provided independent scores to assess the predictive validity of the utility functions. MEASURES: Preference measures included value scores obtained on the Feeling Thermometer and standard gamble utility scores obtained using the Chance Board. RESPONDENTS: A random sample of the general population (> or =16 years of age) in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: Estimates were obtained for eight single-attribute utility functions and an overall multiattribute utility function. The intraclass correlation coefficient between directly measured utility scores and scores generated by the multiattribute function for 73 health states was 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: The HUI3 scoring function has strong theoretical and empirical foundations. It performs well in predicting directly measured scores. The HUI3 system provides a practical way to obtain utility scores based on community preferences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Furlong, W. J., Feeny, D. H., Torrance, G. W., & Barr, R. D. (2001) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.3109/07853890109002092 · Cited by 751 · cited 5×
“(The disutility parameters, ci, correspond to the utility parameters, kj, in Equation (1); c corresponds to k.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSiegel, J. E., Torrance, G. W., Russell, L. B., Luce, B. R., Weinstein, M. C., & Gold, M. R. (1997) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/00019053-199711020-00005 · Cited by 233
Self-citation
Cited by
Ramsey, S. D., Willke, R. J., Glick, H., Reed, S. D., Augustovski, F., Jonsson, B., Briggs, A., & Sullivan, S. D. (2015) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.001 · Cited by 811
Denton, M., Prus, S., & Walters, V. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.008 · Cited by 759
Self-citationMarra, C. A., Woolcott, J. C., Kopec, J. A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J. E., Esdaile, J. M., & Anis, A. H. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.034 · Cited by 398
Luo, N., Johnson, J. A., Shaw, J. W., Feeny, D., & Coons, S. J. (2005) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000182493.57090.c1 · Cited by 383
Self-citationStolk, E., Ludwig, K., Rand, K., van Hout, B., & Ramos-Goñi, J. M. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., Depauw, S., Denton, M., & Boyle, M.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-128
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051883403
- Cited by
- 1,332
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 101.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiattribute and Single-Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006
- The paper
- Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., Depauw, S., Denton, M., & Boyle, M. (2002). Multiattribute and Single-Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.