The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R): Reliability and Validity
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess outcomes of health services, providers need brief, responsive, reliable, and valid measures that can be implemented in clinical settings with minimal cost and burden. The Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32) is a self-report measure developed in 1984 to assess mental health treatment outcomes. During the past 3 years, multiple methods were used to revise the instrument to improve reliability, validity, and applicability to diverse groups of mental health service recipients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to field test the revised instrument, make further changes based on analysis of the field test data, and assess reliability and validity of the final version (BASIS-24). METHODS: A field test was implemented at 27 treatment sites across the United States. A total of 2656 inpatients and 3222 outpatients participated. Factor analytic methods, classic test theory, and item response theory modeling were used to select the most discriminating, nonredundant items for inclusion in the final version of the instrument and to assess its reliability and validity. Item response theory modeling was used to score the instrument. RESULTS: The final instrument includes 24 items assessing 6 domains: depression/ functioning, interpersonal relationships, self-harm, emotional lability, psychosis, and substance abuse. Test-retest and internal consistency reliability were acceptable. Tests of construct and discriminant validity supported the instrument's ability to discriminate groups expected to differ in mental health status, and its correlation with other measures of mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of the BASIS-24 supported its reliability and validity for assessing mental health status from the patient's perspective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24 is a symptom assessment scale.
“the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24, a symptom assessment scale [50]”
From Technology enabled clinical care (TECC): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of smartphone-augmented mental health treatment (2021) · cites this paper as [50]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 262
- Authors
- Eisen, S. V., Normand, S.-L., Belanger, A. J., Spiro, A., & Esch, D.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eisen, Susan V.
- Spiro, Avron
- Esch, David
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1230-1241
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044728766
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh058240-07)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH58240)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- mental health treatment outcomes, self-report measures, instrument revision, field testing, reliability statistics, validity, depression, psychosis, substance abuse, self-harm, emotional lability, interpersonal relationships, inpatients and outpatients
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sickness Impact Profile, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review