Cited by 262Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R): Reliability and Validity

Eisen, Susan V., Normand, Sharon-Lise, Belanger, Albert J., Spiro, Avron, Esch, David·2004·Medical Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess outcomes of health services, providers need brief, responsive, reliable, and valid measures that can be implemented in clinical settings with minimal cost and burden. The Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32) is a self-report measure developed in 1984 to assess mental health treatment outcomes. During the past 3 years, multiple methods were used to revise the instrument to improve reliability, validity, and applicability to diverse groups of mental health service recipients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to field test the revised instrument, make further changes based on analysis of the field test data, and assess reliability and validity of the final version (BASIS-24). METHODS: A field test was implemented at 27 treatment sites across the United States. A total of 2656 inpatients and 3222 outpatients participated. Factor analytic methods, classic test theory, and item response theory modeling were used to select the most discriminating, nonredundant items for inclusion in the final version of the instrument and to assess its reliability and validity. Item response theory modeling was used to score the instrument. RESULTS: The final instrument includes 24 items assessing 6 domains: depression/ functioning, interpersonal relationships, self-harm, emotional lability, psychosis, and substance abuse. Test-retest and internal consistency reliability were acceptable. Tests of construct and discriminant validity supported the instrument's ability to discriminate groups expected to differ in mental health status, and its correlation with other measures of mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of the BASIS-24 supported its reliability and validity for assessing mental health status from the patient's perspective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 262

Authors
Eisen, S. V., Normand, S.-L., Belanger, A. J., Spiro, A., & Esch, D.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Eisen, Susan V.
  • Spiro, Avron
  • Esch, David
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2004-12
Volume
42
Issue
12
Pages
1230-1241
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044728766
Cited by
262
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh058240-07)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH58240)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mental health treatment outcomes, self-report measures, instrument revision, field testing, reliability statistics, validity, depression, psychosis, substance abuse, self-harm, emotional lability, interpersonal relationships, inpatients and outpatients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sickness Impact Profile, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review