Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subject-related risk factors for sports injuries: a 1-yr prospective study in young adults

VAN MECHELEN, WILLEM, TWISK, JOS, MOLENDIJK, ALEXANDER, BLOM, BERTEL, SNEL, JAN, KEMPER, HAN C. G.·1996·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the importance of subject-related risk factors for sports injuries, taking exposure time into account. At baseline in 182 healthy males and females (27 yr) the following subject-related risk factors were assessed: body mass index (BMI), maximal oxygen uptake (direct treadmill measurement), seven aspects of neuromotor fitness (MOPER fitness test), strength of the hamstring and quadriceps muscles (CYBEX), having sustained a sports injury in the 12 months preceding the baseline measurement ("previous injury"), and 16 psychological and psychosocial factors (measured with 8 standard, valid, and reliable questionnaires). For 1 yr, subjects were asked to make daily entries on a monthly log concerning all sports activities exceeding an intensity of 4 MET and all sustained sport injuries. Completed logs were returned by 139 subjects (75 males and 64 females). Fifty-one injuries were registered in 41 subjects. The overall incidence rate (IR) was 3.7 sports injuries per 1000 h of sports participation (95% confidence interval 2.8-4.9). For various subcategories, the following IR per 1000 h of sports participation were calculated: contact sports IR = 11.0 (95% CI 7.4-16.3); noncontact sports IR = 2.3% (95% CI 1.6-3.3); competition IR = 13.4 (95% CI 8.7-20.6); and training IR = 2.8 (95% CI 1.6-5.1). Data were analyzed by stepwise multiple logistic regression. The following five variables were independent and significant (P < 0.05) predictors of risk in sustaining a sport injury: dominance (odds ratio (OR) = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.44-2.03), vital exhaustion (OR = 1.85; CI = 1.22-2.86), stressful life events (OR = 1.84; 95% CI = 1.10-311); these ORs were calculated for an increase of 10% of the range of obtained scores, starting at minimum value. For total sporting time, the OR was calculated by taking the group with a total sporting time below the median (4050 h) as a reference (OR = 6.87; 95% CI = 2.09-22.55). For previous injury, subjects that had not sustained a sports injury in the 12 months preceding the baseline measurements served as a reference for the calculation of the OR (OR = 9.41; 95% CI = 2.80-31.58). These findings confirm that both exposure time and previous injury are more important predictors of sports injuries than psychological, psychosocial, physiological, and anthropometrical factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-199609000-00014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
VAN MECHELEN, W., TWISK, J., MOLENDIJK, A., BLOM, B., SNEL, J., & KEMPER, H. C. G.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1996-09
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
1171-1179
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981369381
Cited by
181
References
1
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subject-related risk factors for sports injuries: a 1-yr prospective study in young adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005768-199609000-00014
The paper
VAN MECHELEN, W., TWISK, J., MOLENDIJK, A., BLOM, B., SNEL, J., & KEMPER, H. C. G. (1996). Subject-related risk factors for sports injuries: a 1-yr prospective study in young adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199609000-00014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.