The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed?
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish the minimal number of days of monitoring required for accelerometers to assess usual physical activity in children. METHODS: A total of 381 students (189 M, 192 F) wore a CSA 7164 uniaxial accelerometer for seven consecutive days. To examine age-related trends students were grouped as follows: Group I: grades 1-3 (N = 92); Group II: grades 4-6 (N = 98); Group III: grades 7-9 (N = 97); Group IV: grades 10-12 (N = 94). Average daily time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was calculated from minute-by-minute activity counts using the regression equation developed by Freedson et al. (1997). RESULTS: Compared with adolescents in grades 7 to 12, children in grades 1 to 6 exhibited less day-to-day variability in MVPA behavior. Spearman-Brown analyses indicated that between 4 and 5 d of monitoring would be necessary to a achieve a reliability of 0.80 in children, and between 8 and 9 d of monitoring would be necessary to achieve a reliability of 0.80 in adolescents. Within all grade levels, the 7-d monitoring protocol produced acceptable estimates of daily participation in MVPA (R = 0.76 (0.71-0.81) to 0.87 (0.84-0.90)). Compared with weekdays, children exhibited significantly higher levels of MVPA on weekends, whereas adolescents exhibited significantly lower levels of MVPA on weekends. Principal components analysis revealed two distinct time components for MVPA during the day for children (early morning, rest of the day), and three distinct time components for MVPA during the day for adolescents (morning, afternoon, early evening). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a 7-d monitoring protocol provides reliable estimates of usual physical activity behavior in children and adolescents and accounts for potentially important differences in weekend versus weekday activity behavior as well as differences in activity patterns within a given day.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research
TROST, S. G., MCIVER, K. L., & PATE, R. R. (2005) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185657.86065.98 · Cited by 2,033
Self-citationCharacteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Pitta, F., Troosters, T., Spruit, M. A., Probst, V. S., Decramer, M., & Gosselink, R. (2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200407-855oc · Cited by 1,256
Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children
RIDDOCH, C. J., BO ANDERSEN, L., WEDDERKOPP, N., HARRO, M., KLASSON-HEGGEBØ, L., SARDINHA, L. B., COOPER, A. R., & EKELUND, U. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000106174.43932.92 · Cited by 900
Faulkner, G. E. J., Buliung, R. N., Flora, P. K., & Fusco, C. (2009) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.017 · Cited by 566
How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults?
TUDORLOCKE, C., BURKETT, L., REIS, J., AINSWORTH, B., MACERA, C., & WILSON, D. (2005) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.003 · Cited by 479
Metadata
- Authors
- TROST, S. G., PATE, R. R., FREEDSON, P. S., SALLIS, J. F., & TAYLOR, W. C.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 426
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050178102
- Cited by
- 1,136
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025
- The paper
- TROST, S. G., PATE, R. R., FREEDSON, P. S., SALLIS, J. F., & TAYLOR, W. C. (2000). Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.