The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fascicle length of leg muscles is greater in sprinters than distance runners
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare architectural characteristics of leg muscles of sprinters and distance runners. METHODS: Skeletal muscle architectural characteristics were studied in 23 elite male 100-m sprinters (SPR, 10.0-10.9 s for 100 m), 24 elite male distance runners (DR, 13.5-14.5 min for 5000 m), and 24 untrained male controls. Fascicle pennation angle and isolated muscle thickness of the vastus lateralis and gastrocnemius medialis and lateralis muscles were measured in vivo by ultrasound, and fascicle length was estimated. RESULTS: Standing height and upper and lower limb lengths were similar among the groups. Body weight was significantly greater in SPR than in either DR or controls, which were similar. Muscle thickness of the vastus lateralis and gastrocnemius medialis and lateralis muscles was significantly greater in SPR than in either DR or controls, which were similar. In all muscles, pennation angle was similar between SPR and controls, but less than DR. Fascicle length of the vastus lateralis muscle (absolute and relative to limb length) was greatest in SPR and least in DR with control values being between the athlete groups. Fascicle length of the gastrocnemius medialis muscle (absolute and relative to limb length) was greater in SPR than in either DR or controls, which were similar. Fascicle length of the gastrocnemius lateralis muscle (absolute and relative to limb length) was significantly greater in SPR than DR. Absolute fascicle length in gastrocnemius lateralis muscle was similar between DR and controls; however, relative to limb length DR was significantly less. CONCLUSION: Greater fascicle length and lesser pennation angle observed in leg muscles of SPR, compared with DR, would appear to favor shortening velocity as required for greater running speed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spector, S. A., Gardiner, P. F., Zernicke, R. F., Roy, R. R., & Edgerton, V. R. (1980) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1980.44.5.951 · Cited by 397
Cited by
Developing Maximal Neuromuscular Power: Part 1 – Biological Basis of Maximal Power Production
Cormie, P., McGuigan, M. R., & Newton, R. U. (2011) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/11537690-000000000-00000 · Cited by 774
Fukutani, A., & Kurihara, T. (2015) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1133-1 · Cited by 44
Franchi, M. V., Atherton, P. J., Maganaris, C. N., & Narici, M. V. (2016) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1548-8 · Cited by 41
Cochrane-Snyman, K. C., Housh, T. J., Smith, C. M., Hill, E. C., Jenkins, N. D. M., Schmidt, R. J., & Johnson, G. O. (2016) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-016-3394-y · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- ABE, T., KUMAGAI, K., & BRECHUE, W. F.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1125-1129
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086661212
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.