The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Retrospective Analysis of Pituitary Apoplexy
Abstract
Thirty-seven patients with pituitary apoplexy were analyzed with an emphasis on clinical presentation and visual outcome. Their mean age was 56.6 years, with a male to female ratio of 2:1. Presenting symptoms included headache (95%), vomiting (69%), ocular paresis (78%), and reduction in visual fields (64%) or acuities (52%). Computed tomographic scanning correctly identified pituitary hemorrhage in only 46% of those scanned. Thirty-six patients underwent transsphenoidal decompression. By immunostaining criteria, null-cell adenomas were the most frequent tumor type (50%). Long-term steroid or thyroid hormone replacement therapy was necessary in 82% and 89% of patients, respectively. Long-term desmopressin therapy was required in 11%, and 64% of the male patients required testosterone replacement therapy. Surgery resulted in improvement in visual acuity deficits in 88%, visual field deficits in 95%, and ocular paresis in 100%. Analysis of the degree of improvement in preoperative visual deficits with the timing of the surgery demonstrated that those who underwent surgery within a week of apoplexy had significant recovery in their visual acuities. In the stable, conscious patient with residual vision in each eye, surgical decompression should be performed as soon as possible, because delays beyond 1 week may retard the return of visual function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Classical pituitary apoplexy: clinical features, management and outcome
Randeva, H. S., Schoebel, J., Byrne, J., Esiri, M., Adams, C. B. T., & Wass, J. A. H. (1999) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00754.x · Cited by 576
Pituitary apoplexy: a review of clinical presentation, management and outcome in 45 cases
Sibal, L., Ball, S. G., Connolly, V., James, R. A., Kane, P., Kelly, W. F., Kendall-Taylor, P., Mathias, D., Perros, P., Quinton, R., et al. (2004) · Pituitary · doi:10.1007/s11102-005-1050-3 · Cited by 309
Acute management of pituitary apoplexy–surgery or conservative management?
Ayuk, J., McGregor, E. J., Mitchell, R. D., & Gittoes, N. J. L. (2004) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2004.02162.x · Cited by 236
Pituitary tumor apoplexy: characteristics, treatment, and outcomes
Verrees, M., Arafah, B. M., & Selman, W. R. (2004) · Neurosurgical Focus · doi:10.3171/foc.2004.16.4.7 · Cited by 195
Conservative management of pituitary apoplexy: a prospective study.
Maccagnan, P., Macedo, C. L., Kayath, M. J., Nogueira, R. G., & Abucham, J. (1995) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.80.7.7608278 · Cited by 183
Management of endocrine disease: pituitary tumour apoplexy
Capatina, C., Inder, W., Karavitaki, N., & Wass, J. A. H. (2015) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-14-0794 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Bills, D. C., Meyer, F. B., Laws, E. R., Davis, D. H., Ebersold, M. J., Scheithauer, B. W., Ilstrup, D. M., & Abboud, C. F.
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1993-10-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 602-609
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4040
- OpenAlex
- W2061104705
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.