Complications of Epilepsy Surgery after 654 Procedures in Sweden, September 1990–1995: A Multicenter Study Based on the Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Register
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To present the first national multicenter study on complications after epilepsy surgery procedures to include all epilepsy surgery centers in Sweden: Göteborg, Linköping, Lund, Stockholm, Umeå, and Uppsala. METHODS: Every epilepsy surgery procedure in Sweden is reported to the Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Register. The report includes relevant social and medical items and complications. A complication is defined as minor if it resolves within 3 months and major if it affects activities of daily living and lasts longer than 3 months. Follow-up data are recorded for 2 years after the operation. Intrinsic checkpoints and external revision validate the register data. RESULTS: During the inclusion period (September 1990–December 1995), 654 surgical procedures were performed (age range, 6 mo–67 yr). Of these, 205 were invasive electrode procedures (182 first investigations and 23 reinvestigations), and 449 were therapeutic procedures (375 first operations and 74 reoperations). After invasive electrode procedures, only minor complications were reported (6.3%). For all 449 therapeutic procedures (including reoperations), minor complications were reported in 8.9% and major complications in 3.1%. Only one major complication was reported in a patient under the age of 35 years. CONCLUSION: This is the first national multicenter study on complications after epilepsy surgery. It demonstrates that these procedures as performed at six different centers in Sweden are safe, but also that risk is related to age. In patients younger than age 35 years, the risk for a major complication after invasive subdural strip electrode investigation and epilepsy surgery is low.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The direct intraparenchymal hippocampal route poses the greatest risk of an adverse event.
“the direct intraparenchymal hippocampal route poses the greatest risk of an adverse event”
From AAVrh.10-Mediated APOE2 Central Nervous System Gene Therapy for APOE4-Associated Alzheimer's Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [48]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AAVrh.10-Mediated APOE2 Central Nervous System Gene Therapy for APOE4-Associated Alzheimer's Disease
Rosenberg, J. B., Kaplitt, M. G., De, B. P., Chen, A., Flagiello, T., Salami, C., Pey, E., Zhao, L., Ricart Arbona, R. J., Monette, S., et al. (2018) · Human Gene Therapy Clinical Development · doi:10.1089/humc.2017.231 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rydenhag, B., & Silander, H. C.
- Affiliations
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
- ORCID
- Rydenhag, Bertil
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4040
- OpenAlex
- W1967096335
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
- Keywords
- epilepsy surgery, postoperative complications, surgical safety, subdural strip electrodes, reoperation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Epilepsy, Humans, Infant, Middle Aged, Registries, Sweden, Age Distribution, Neurosurgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review