The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moral Reasoning and Moral Behavior Among Selected Groups of Practicing Nurses
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between moral reasoning and moral behavior in 79 practicing nurses. Moral reasoning was measured by Rest's Defining Issues Test. Judgments about Nursing Decisions (JAND), developed by the investigator, was used to measure moral behavior. JAND is compromised of seven stories, each depicting a nurse in an ethical dilemma, with a total of 48 items. It measures two components of moral behavior: knowledge and valuation of ideal moral behavior and perception of realistic moral behavior. The hypothesis that moral reasoning would be positively related to knowledge and valuation of ideal moral behavior was tested by Pearson product moment correlation; the obtained coefficient of .28 was significant at the .01 level. The hypothesis that moral reasoning would be positively related to nurses' perception of realistic moral behavior was also tested by Pearson product moment correlation; the obtained coefficient of .19 was significant at the .05 level. Additional analyses showed significant differences in the knowledge and valuation component of JAND between educational groups, ethnic groups, age groups, and years of practice in nursing; but, there were no differences between these groups with respect to the perception of realist moral behavior component of JAND. Implications of the findings for nursing practice, education, and research are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In line with previous research [53–55], the findings of this study showed that moral reasoning decreases with increasing nurses’ work experience.”
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–108 of 108
MORAL DILEMMA AND PROCESS OF ITS SOLUTION IN NURSING PRACTICE
Balážová, L. (2009) · Profese online · doi:10.5507/pol.2009.007
Temporal Perspective, Professional Identity, and Perceived Wellbeing
Brenner, P. S. (2019)
İlkokul Düzeyinde Ahlaki Bir Karakter Eğitimi Programı İçin İhtiyaç Analizi
YILMAZ, F. (2020) · Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.14582/duzgef.2020.147
The Moral Reasoning of Nurse Practitioners
Viens, D. (1991) · doi:10.22371/07.1991.008
Research Progress on the Nursing Ethical Decision-Making Ability of Clinical Nurses
陈, 鑫. (2025) · Nursing Science · doi:10.12677/ns.2025.146135
Khaghanizadeh, M., Koohi, A., Ebadi, A., & Vahedian-Azimi, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26608710
Khaghanizadeh, M., Koohi, A., Ebadi, A., & Vahedian-Azimi, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26608707
Zheng, Q., Hu, Y., Lai, Y., Yang, Y., Zhou, X., Yuan, Y., Sun, Z., Wen, P., Fu, J., & Yang, M. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107420
Metadata
- Authors
- KETEFIAN, S.
- Venue
- Nursing Research
- Published
- 1981-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171???176
- ISSN
- 0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W197499387
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- moral reasoning, moral behavior, nurses, ethical dilemmas, nursing ethics, nursing education, ethnic differences, age differences, years of practice
- MeSH terms
- Decision Making, Ethics, Nursing, Humans, Judgment, Morals, Surveys and Questionnaires, Moral Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review