The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A Meta-analytic Study of Predictors for Loneliness During Adolescence
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extensive research has been completed to investigate loneliness in adolescents over the past several decades; identification of key predictors for loneliness was needed using meta-analytic techniques. OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors for loneliness in adolescents through a comprehensive review of the literature and to use quantitative meta-analysis to determine the magnitude of the relationships between each predictor and loneliness. METHODS: The literature reviewed included 242 studies published or unpublished between 1980 and 2004, of which 95 met the inclusion criteria. Eleven key predictors for loneliness were identified in the 95 studies. A meta-analysis was conducted on each of the 11 predictors in relation to loneliness. RESULTS: Four predictors (gender, depression, shyness, and self-esteem) had large effect sizes, four predictors (social support, social anxiety, maternal expressiveness, and paternal expressiveness) had large medium to medium effect sizes, two predictors (stress and self-disclosure) had low effect sizes, and one predictor (age) had a very low effect size. DISCUSSION: Theories of loneliness served as a framework for interpreting the findings of the meta-analysis. The most powerful predictors can be used in intervention studies aimed at reducing loneliness in adolescents.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a meta-analytic study of factors related to loneliness during adolescence, older age was found to be associated with higher levels of loneliness with a low effect size.
“In a meta-analytic study of factors related to loneliness during adolescence, older age was found to be associated with higher levels of loneliness with a low effect size.”
From A Longitudinal Study of Loneliness Before the End of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trajectories, Predictors, and Impact on Chinese Adolescent Mental Health (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 330
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Antognoli-Toland, 1999, Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 3, 7
- Antognoli-Toland, 2000, Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 4, 7
- Mahon, 1983, Topics in Clinical Nursing, 6, 66
- Rew, 2001, cholarship, 33, 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahon, N. E., Yarcheski, A., Yarcheski, T. J., Cannella, B. L., & Hanks, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- ORCID
- Cannella, Barbara L.
- Venue
- Nursing Research
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 308-315
- ISSN
- 0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045083736
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- loneliness, adolescents, predictors of loneliness, gender differences, depression, shyness, self-esteem, social support, social anxiety, stress, self-disclosure, loneliness interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review