Cited by 330Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentHealth disparities and outcomesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A Meta-analytic Study of Predictors for Loneliness During Adolescence

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extensive research has been completed to investigate loneliness in adolescents over the past several decades; identification of key predictors for loneliness was needed using meta-analytic techniques. OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors for loneliness in adolescents through a comprehensive review of the literature and to use quantitative meta-analysis to determine the magnitude of the relationships between each predictor and loneliness. METHODS: The literature reviewed included 242 studies published or unpublished between 1980 and 2004, of which 95 met the inclusion criteria. Eleven key predictors for loneliness were identified in the 95 studies. A meta-analysis was conducted on each of the 11 predictors in relation to loneliness. RESULTS: Four predictors (gender, depression, shyness, and self-esteem) had large effect sizes, four predictors (social support, social anxiety, maternal expressiveness, and paternal expressiveness) had large medium to medium effect sizes, two predictors (stress and self-disclosure) had low effect sizes, and one predictor (age) had a very low effect size. DISCUSSION: Theories of loneliness served as a framework for interpreting the findings of the meta-analysis. The most powerful predictors can be used in intervention studies aimed at reducing loneliness in adolescents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006199-200609000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 330

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Antognoli-Toland, 1999, Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 3, 7
  2. Antognoli-Toland, 2000, Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 4, 7
  3. Mahon, 1983, Topics in Clinical Nursing, 6, 66
  4. Rew, 2001, cholarship, 33, 33

Metadata

Authors
Mahon, N. E., Yarcheski, A., Yarcheski, T. J., Cannella, B. L., & Hanks, M. M.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Nursing Research
Published
2006-09
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
308-315
ISSN
0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045083736
Cited by
330
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
loneliness, adolescents, predictors of loneliness, gender differences, depression, shyness, self-esteem, social support, social anxiety, stress, self-disclosure, loneliness interventions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review