Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Maine Womenʼs Health Study: I. Outcomes of Hysterectomy

CARLSON, KAREN J., MILLER, BUELL A., FOWLER, FLOYD J.·1994·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of hysterectomy for nonmalignant conditions on symptoms and quality of life and to identify adverse effects 1 year after surgery. METHODS: The Maine Women's Health Study was a prospective cohort study of 418 women ages 25-50 years undergoing hysterectomy for any nonmalignant condition. Patients recruited from the practices of 63 physicians performing hysterectomy throughout Maine were interviewed at the time of surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months later. Clinical and hospitalization data were obtained from physician reports and from a statewide hospital discharge data base. The primary outcomes of interest were symptom relief, changes in quality of life, and the development of new symptoms or problems during the year following surgery. RESULTS: The most frequent indications for hysterectomy were leiomyomas (35%), abnormal bleeding (22%), and chronic pelvic pain (18%). For these indications, hysterectomy resulted in marked improvements in a range of symptoms, including pelvic pain, urinary symptoms, fatigue, psychological symptoms, and sexual dysfunction. Significant improvements in scores for indices of mental health, general health, and activity were evident at 6 months and sustained at 1 year. New problems after hysterectomy (measured in those free of the symptom preoperatively) included hot flashes (13%), weight gain (12%), depression (8%), and lack of interest in sex (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy is highly effective for relief of symptoms associated with common nonmalignant gynecologic conditions. Symptom relief following hysterectomy is associated with a marked improvement in quality of life. New problems are reported after hysterectomy by a limited number of women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006250-199404000-00012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
CARLSON, K. J., MILLER, B. A., & FOWLER, F. J.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
1994-04
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
556-565
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056343794
Cited by
441
References
0
FWCI
21.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Maine Womenʼs Health Study: I. Outcomes of Hysterectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006250-199404000-00012
The paper
CARLSON, K. J., MILLER, B. A., & FOWLER, F. J. (1994). The Maine Womenʼs Health Study: I. Outcomes of Hysterectomy. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-199404000-00012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.