Cited by 46Ear Surgery and Otitis MediaSinusitis and nasal conditionsEar and Head Tumors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Management of chronic middle ear effusion with prednisone combined with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

BERMAN, STEPHEN, GROSE, KATHRYN, NUSS, RACHELLE, HUBER-NAVIN, CLARE, ROARK, ROBERT, GABBARD, SANDRA ABBOTT, BAGNALL, TRACY·1990·The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

Fifty-three patients were enrolled and evaluable in a randomized, double-blinded controlled clinical trial comparing prednisone for 7 days plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) for 30 days vs. TMP/SMZ alone in treating chronic middle ear effusion (MEE). Clearing of the effusion in both ears or in one when only one was involved was called complete resolution; clearing in one of two affected ears was called partial resolution. The outcomes 2 weeks after initiation of therapy of 26 patients initially treated with prednisone plus TMP/SMZ were complete resolution in 20, partial resolution in three, and unchanged in three. The outcomes in 27 patients initially treated with TMP/SMZ alone were complete resolution in eight, partial resolution in three, unchanged in 13 and development of acute otitis media in three (P less than 0.01 for complete resolution). Two weeks after initiation of therapy, patients with a MEE that failed to clear were crossed over to the alternative regimen. Overall 29 of 41 patients (71%) who received oral prednisone plus TMP/SMZ initially or after the crossover had complete resolution of their middle ear effusion at 2 weeks after starting prednisone and TMP/SMZ. Five of 35 (14%) patients treated with prednisone plus TMP/SMZ and one of six (17%) patients treated with TMP/SMZ alone who had complete resolution at 4 weeks required subsequent referrals for tympanostomy tubes. A course of prednisone for 7 days plus TMP/SMZ for 30 days with monthly follow-up s…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006454-199008000-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 46

Metadata

Authors
BERMAN, S., GROSE, K., NUSS, R., HUBER-NAVIN, C., ROARK, R., GABBARD, S. A., & BAGNALL, T.
Venue
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
1990-08
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
533-538
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970124329
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (RR-69)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Ear and Head Tumors
Keywords
prednisone, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, combination therapy, acute otitis media, tympanostomy tubes, pediatric otitis media, corticosteroid therapy
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Infant, Middle Ear Ventilation, Otitis Media with Effusion, Prednisone, Prognosis, Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review