Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

National differences in incidence of acute mastoiditis: relationship to prescribing patterns of antibiotics for acute otitis media?

VAN ZUIJLEN, DIEDERICK A., SCHILDER, ANNE G. M., VAN BALEN, FRANK A. M., HOES, ARNO W.·2001·The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Operating on the principle that most acute otitis media (AOM) episodes resolve without antibiotics, doctors in the Netherlands usually manage AOM in children with initial observation. Prescription of antibiotics is limited to children with a complicated course of AOM and those categorized as high risk. Consequently only 31% of patients with AOM receives antibiotics, compared with >90% in most other countries. OBJECTIVE: To substantiate the suggestion that this restrictive use of antibiotics leads to a higher incidence of acute mastoiditis. METHODS: A comparative study across several European countries, Canada, Australia and the United States was performed in the period 1991 to 1998. The incidence rate of acute mastoiditis was defined as the total number of patients age 14 years and younger discharged from all hospitals with the primary diagnosis of acute mastoiditis, during a specified period (usually 5 years), divided by the number of person years (py) in that same age range and period. The latter was calculated by totaling the midyear population estimate of children age 14 years and younger of each year. The 95% confidence intervals and incidence rate ratios were calculated to compare the observed rates. RESULTS: The incidence rate of acute mastoiditis in the Netherlands, with a low antibiotic prescription rate for AOM, was 3.8/100,000 py; in Norway and Denmark, with high prescription rates, the incidence rate was comparable at 3.5/100,000 py and 4.2/100,000 py, respectively. In all other countries with very high prescription rates, incidence rates were considerably lower, ranging from 1.2 to 2.0/100,000 py. The incidence rate in the Netherlands was about twice that in the United States (rate ratio, 0.5). CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of acute mastoiditis in the Netherlands is higher than in many countries with higher antibiotic prescription rates. Although the potential benefits of restricted use of antibiotics (i.e. cost reduction, fewer side effects from antibiotics and less antimicrobial resistance) are beyond dispute, such strategy may be associated with a somewhat higher incidence of acute mastoiditis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006454-200102000-00004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
VAN ZUIJLEN, D. A., SCHILDER, A. G. M., VAN BALEN, F. A. M., & HOES, A. W.
Venue
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
2001-02
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
140-144
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085895329
Cited by
262
References
0
FWCI
16.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National differences in incidence of acute mastoiditis: relationship to prescribing patterns of antibiotics for acute otitis media? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006454-200102000-00004
The paper
VAN ZUIJLEN, D. A., SCHILDER, A. G. M., VAN BALEN, F. A. M., & HOES, A. W. (2001). National differences in incidence of acute mastoiditis: relationship to prescribing patterns of antibiotics for acute otitis media? The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-200102000-00004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.