The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two Replantations of Severed Ear Parts
Abstract
Salt Lake City, Utah From the Departments of Surgery (Plastic) of the University of Utah and St. Mark's Hospital.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Pederson, W. C. (2001) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200103000-00027 · Cited by 99
Replantation of Amputated Parts of the Penis, Nose, Ear, and Scalp
Strauch, B., Sharzer, L. A., Petro, J. A., et al. (1983) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0094-1298(20)31918-0 · Cited by 28
Microsurgical ear replantation—is venous repair necessary?—A systematic review
Momeni, A. J., Liu, X., Januszyk, M., et al. (2015) · Microsurgery · doi:10.1002/micr.22411 · Cited by 25
Three cases of successful microvascular ear replantation after bite avulsion injury
Schönauer, F., Blair, J. W., Moloney, D. M., et al. (2004) · Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery · doi:10.1080/02844310310016269 · Cited by 20
Mello-Filho, F. V., Mamede, R. C. M., & Koury, A. P. (1999) · Sao Paulo Medical Journal · doi:10.1590/s1516-31801999000500007 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, E. C., & Fowler, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 1979-11
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 703-705
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4256525100
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Keywords
- ear replantation, ear amputation, microsurgical reconstruction, ear reconstruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review