The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A Cadaveric and Clinical Evaluation of Endoscopically Assisted Zygomatic Fracture Repair
Abstract
An endoscopic method of malar arch repair without a bicoronal incision has been recently described. To determine the effectiveness of this new technique, a cadaver study was performed to evaluate the capacity of this technique to (1) restore the anatomic position of a fractured malar arch, (2) rigidly fixate the arch, and (3) avoid injury to the frontal branch of the facial nerve. The technique of endoscopically assisted fracture repair was then applied to a clinical series of consecutive patients presenting with displaced zygomatic fractures with comminution at the malar arch. All cadaveric specimens repaired with this endoscopic technique demonstrated anatomic reduction and rigid fixation of the arch without disruption of the frontal branch of the facial nerve. In all clinical cases, four-point rigid plate fixation (zygomaticofrontal, infraorbital, malar arch, and zygomaticomaxillary buttress) was achieved endoscopically with limited access incisions. All clinical cases demonstrated excellent skeletal restoration of the zygoma on postoperative computed tomography scans. On clinical examination, facial symmetry and normal facial nerve function were observed in all patients after operation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 44
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Gruss, 1990, Plast Reconstr Surg, 85, 878, 10.1097/00006534-199006000-00008 · DOI
- Gruss, 1996, Plast Reconstr Surg, 97, 351, 10.1097/00006534-199602000-00012 · DOI
- Lee, 1996, Ann Plast Surg, 37, 178, 10.1097/00000637-199608000-00011 · DOI
- Stanley, 1989, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 115, 1459, 10.1001/archotol.1989.01860360061018 · DOI
- Kobayashi, 1995, J Craniofac Surg, 6, 519, 10.1097/00001665-199511000-00022 · DOI · Paper page
- Pearl, 1992, Clin Plast Surg, 19, 99, 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)30898-1 · DOI
- Pearl, 1990, Ann Plast Surg, 25, 132, 10.1097/00000637-199008000-00010 · DOI
- Pearl, 1987, Ann Plast Surg, 19, 349, 10.1097/00000637-198710000-00011 · DOI
- Covington, 1994, J Trauma, 37, 243, 10.1097/00005373-199408000-00016 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, C. H., Lee, C., Trabulsy, P. P., Alexander, J. T., & Lee, K.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- ORCID
- Lee, Kelvin
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 333-345
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094463319
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
- Keywords
- zygomatic fractures, facial nerve injury prevention, rigid plate fixation, facial symmetry, facial trauma surgery
- MeSH terms
- Cadaver, Endoscopy, Humans, Male, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Zygomatic Fractures, Treatment Outcome, Fractures, Comminuted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review