The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autologous Latissimus Breast Reconstruction: A 3-Year Clinical Experience with 100 Patients
Abstract
This article presents our technique of autologous breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi flap and studies the advantages, disadvantages, and results that can be expected. A consecutive sample of 100 patients was studied. The average length of follow-up was 20 months (range 8 to 44 months), and all of the subjects were reviewed in consultation without loss to follow-up. The supplementary volume of the latissimus dorsi was obtained from five fatty zones: fat on the cutaneous paddle, fat taken from the surface of the muscle, the scapular fat pad, the anterior fatty zone, and the supra-iliac fat pad. This technique must be measured against the transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap, free or pedicled, when the patient needs an autologous breast reconstruction. It can be used when the TRAM flap is contraindicated (this corresponds to 45 percent of patients of our sample) or when the dorsal donor site is preferred (55 percent of cases of our sample). The major complications are rare (1 percent partial necrosis and 1 percent total necrosis of the flap). The minor complications are represented mainly by the dorsal seroma. This is the main drawback of the technique, as it occurs in 79 percent of cases and regularly in obese patients. In view of this frequency, patients should be warned of its likely occurrence. The dorsal donor-site morbidity is relatively low; 4 percent of dorsal sequelae were classed as moderate, and 96 percent were considered low. The scapular sequelae have been classed as low in 97 percent of cases, and temporary scapular sequelae aggravation has been noted in 3 percent. Results of breast reconstruction using this technique are most encouraging. The level of patient satisfaction is high; 87 percent of them were deeply satisfied, 10 percent were satisfied, and only 3 percent were poorly satisfied. This group of poorly satisfied subjects (3 percent) consists of patients who suffered a serious postoperative complication. The aesthetic results have been judged excellent by surgeons in 85 percent of the cases, good in 12 percent of the cases, and poor in 3 percent of the cases; no result has been judged bad. This technique of breast reconstruction by autologous latissimus dorsi brings a major advance in breast reconstruction. The best indications of this technique are when one can bury the cutaneous paddle: cases of skin-sparing mastectomy, cases where the latissimus dorsi flap can be combined with an abdominal advancement flap, and cases of conversion of implant reconstruction to an autologous reconstruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Delay, E., Garson, S., Tousson, G., & Sinna, R. (2009) · Aesthetic Surgery Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asj.2009.08.010 · Cited by 536
Self-citationBreast Reconstruction after Surgery for Breast Cancer
Cordeiro, P. G. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmct0802899 · Cited by 395
Yueh, J. H., Slavin, S. A., Adesiyun, T., Nyame, T. T., Gautam, S., Morris, D. J., Tobias, A. M., & Lee, B. T. (2010) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181cb6351 · Cited by 390
Metadata
- Authors
- Delay, E., Gounot, N., Bouillot, A., Zlatoff, P., & Rivoire, M.
- Venue
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1461-1478
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978131962
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autologous Latissimus Breast Reconstruction: A 3-Year Clinical Experience with 100 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00020
- The paper
- Delay, E., Gounot, N., Bouillot, A., Zlatoff, P., & Rivoire, M. (1998). Autologous Latissimus Breast Reconstruction: A 3-Year Clinical Experience with 100 Patients. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.