Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Soft-Tissue Facial Morphometry from 6 Years to Adulthood: A Three-Dimensional Growth Study Using a New Modeling

Ferrario, Virgilio F., Sforza, Chiarella, Poggio, Carlo E., Schmitz, Johannes H.·1999·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

A recently introduced three-dimensional computerized system with landmark representation of the soft-tissue facial surface allows noninvasive and fast quantitative study of facial growth. The aims of the present investigation were (1) to quantify growth changes in soft-tissue facial morphology, (2) to evaluate sex differences in growth patterns, and (3) to provide reference data for selected angular and linear measurements that could be of interest for the objective analysis of maxillofacial surgery or orthodontic patients. The three-dimensional coordinates of 22 standardized facial landmarks were automatically collected by automated infrared photogrammetry using the three-dimensional facial morphometry method in a mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional study, in which 2023 examinations were obtained in 1348 healthy nonpatient subjects between 6 years of age and young adulthood. Selected parameters (angles, linear distances, and ratios) were calculated and averaged for age and sex. Male values were compared with female values by means of Student's t test. Within each age group, linear distances were significantly larger in boys than in girls (p < 0.05) with some exceptions coinciding with the earlier female growth spurt, whereas angular measurements did not show a corresponding sexual dimorphism. Linear distances in girls had almost reached adult dimensions in the 12-to-13-year-old age group, whereas in boys a large increase was still to occur. This was most evident in the mi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006534-199903000-00002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Burke, 1989, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 96, 144, 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90255-2 · DOI
  2. Ras, 1996, J Dent, 24, 369, 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00081-X · DOI
  3. Kawai, 1990, Part I Method Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 19, 356, 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80081-5 · DOI
  4. Moss, 1987, Eur J Orthod, 9, 247, 10.1093/ejo/9.1.247 · DOI
  5. Bush, 1996, Plast Reconstr Surg, 98, 226, 10.1097/00006534-199608000-00004 · DOI
  6. Moss, 1994, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 105, 430, 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70002-8 · DOI
  7. Bishara, 1985, Am J Orthod, 88, 209, 10.1016/S0002-9416(85)90216-7 · DOI
  8. Nanda, 1995, Semin Orthod, 1, 67, 10.1016/S1073-8746(95)80094-8 · DOI
  9. Ferrario, 1996, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 109, 86, 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70167-1 · DOI
  10. Ferrario, 1998, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 114, 404, 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70185-4 · DOI
  11. Ferrario, 1994, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 9, 303
  12. Ferrario, 1994, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52, 1126, 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90528-2 · DOI
  13. Ferrario, 1995, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 53, 1008, 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90115-9 · DOI
  14. Ferrario, 1997, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 12, 145
  15. Ferrario, 1997, J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol, 17, 86
  16. Ferrario, 1997, Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 34, 309, 10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0309:TDSOGA>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  17. Ferrario, 1998, Anat Rec, 250, 480, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199804)250:4<480::AID-AR12>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  18. Ferrario, 1996, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 11, 329
  19. Farkas, 1992, Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 29, 301, 10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0301:GADORU>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  20. Farkas, 1996, Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 33, 10, 10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0010:AOAMPP>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  21. Mauchamp, 1973, Am J Orthod, 64, 83, 10.1016/0002-9416(73)90282-0 · DOI
  22. Prahl-Andersen, 1995, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 107, 476, 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70114-1 · DOI
  23. Nanda, 1990, Angle Orthod, 60, 177
  24. Foley, 1997, Angle Orthod, 67, 373
  25. Ligthelm-Bakker, 1992, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 101, 509, 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70124-S · DOI
  26. Dubrova, 1995, Hum Biol, 67, 755
  27. Merrifield, 1966, Am J Orthod, 56, 804, 10.1016/0002-9416(66)90250-8 · DOI
  28. Cox, 1970, Am J Orthod, 60, 175, 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90033-9 · DOI
  29. Zylinski, 1992, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 101, 514, 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70125-T · DOI
  30. Kuyl, 1994, J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 106, 597, 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70084-2 · DOI
  31. Hershon, 1980, Am J Orthod, 78, 279, 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90273-0 · DOI
  32. Giddon, 1995, Semin Orthod, 1, 82, 10.1016/S1073-8746(95)80095-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ferrario, V. F., Sforza, C., Poggio, C. E., & Schmitz, J. H.
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
1999-03
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
768-778
ISSN
0032-1052
Cited by
55
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review