The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Morphological Recovery in the Reattached Retina
Abstract
After experimental retinal detachment in the cat, a number of morphological changes take place in retinal and RPE cells. Following reattachment, the ultrastructural relationship between the photoreceptors and the RPE is re-established, but it does not return to the predetachment state even after short detachment episodes coupled with prolonged recovery periods. All of the reattached retinae show some degree of abnormality, ranging from subtle changes in photoreceptor ultrastructure to dramatic degenerative effects in the outer retina. Abrupt transitions in morphology from one reattached area to an adjacent area are not unusual. Photoreceptor recovery varies widely between animals, and between adjacent regions within the same retina. Ensheathment of outer segments by RPE apical processes is abnormal. In some reattached areas rod outer segment dimensions and disc structure are near normal as is the displacement rate of rod outer segment discs. In others, especially in areas of RPE or Müller cell proliferation and hypertrophy, the outer segments are shortened or absent completely, and there is a reduction of cell bodies in the outer nuclear layer. In some retinae, recovery in cones is inferior to that in rods. At short detachment durations (less than 1 wk) morphological recovery in the reattached retina is optimal while at long intervals (greater than 1 month) recovery is poor. The changes at the photoreceptor-RPE interface identified in the reattached cat retina probably have adverse effects on visual recovery when they occur within the human macula.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bringmann, A., Iandiev, I., Pannicke, T., Wurm, A., Hollborn, M., Wiedemann, P., Osborne, N. N., & Reichenbach, A. (2009) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.07.001 · Cited by 761
Fibrin directs early retinal damage after experimental subretinal hemorrhage
Toth, C. A. (1991) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050139046 · Cited by 313
Cellular remodeling in mammalian retina: Results from studies of experimental retinal detachment
Fisher, S. K., Lewis, G. P., Linberg, K. A., & Verardo, M. R. (2005) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.10.004 · Cited by 298
Self-citationFoveal Microstructure and Visual Acuity after Retinal Detachment Repair
Wakabayashi, T., Oshima, Y., Fujimoto, H., Murakami, Y., Sakaguchi, H., Kusaka, S., & Tano, Y. (2009) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.001 · Cited by 296
Algvere, P. V., Berglin, L., Gouras, P., Sheng, Y., & Kopp, E. D. (1997) · Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/bf00941722 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, D. H., Guerin, C. J., Erickson, P. A., Stern, W. H., & Fisher, S. K.
- Venue
- Retina
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58
- ISSN
- 0275-004X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W122777485
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphological Recovery in the Reattached Retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006982-198700710-00014
- The paper
- Anderson, D. H., Guerin, C. J., Erickson, P. A., Stern, W. H., & Fisher, S. K. (1987). Morphological Recovery in the Reattached Retina. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-198700710-00014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.