Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

NATURAL HISTORY OF SUBFOVEAL SUBRETINAL HEMORRHAGE IN AGERELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

AVERY, ROBERT L., FEKRAT, SHARON, HAWKINS, BARBARA S., BRESSLER, NEIL M.·1996·Retina

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors describe the natural history of subfoveal subretinal hemorrhage (for which laser treatment was not indicated) in age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A retrospective review of data was performed at a tertiary retinal referral center for 41 eyes from 40 patients with age-related macular degeneration examined during an 18-month period. All patients had at least 3 months of follow-up, as well as subfoveal subretinal hemorrhage that made up more than 50% of a neovascular lesion-as documented by fluorescein angiography-and therefore, did not meet criteria for laser treatment. The number of lines of visual acuity lost or gained in each eye during follow-up was calculated; presenting characteristics were evaluated as predictors of visual outcome. RESULTS: A progressive loss of visual acuity from baseline was observed throughout the 3-year follow-up period in most eyes. At 36 months, a mean of 3.5 lines of visual acuity had been lost in the 16 eyes examined; 44% of eyes had lost 6 or more lines of visual acuity. The percentage of patients who sustained a spontaneous improvement of 3 or more lines of visual acuity decreased from 31% at 12 months to 21% at 36 months of follow-up. Univariate linear regression analysis demonstrated significant relationships of initial size of the hemorrhage, elevation of the retina by the hemorrhage, and size of the entire lesion with visual outcome at the 12-month and 36-month examinations (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although this study confirms that some eyes with subfoveal subretinal hemorrhage associated with age-related macular degeneration have poor prognoses, the visual acuity of other eyes did not deteriorate. These findings underscore the importance of evaluating the role of therapeutic interventions such as surgery to remove subretinal hemorrhage in randomized clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006982-199616030-00001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
AVERY, R. L., FEKRAT, S., HAWKINS, B. S., & BRESSLER, N. M.
Venue
Retina
Published
1996
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
183-189
ISSN
0275-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028465838
Cited by
334
References
0
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NATURAL HISTORY OF SUBFOVEAL SUBRETINAL HEMORRHAGE IN AGERELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006982-199616030-00001
The paper
AVERY, R. L., FEKRAT, S., HAWKINS, B. S., & BRESSLER, N. M. (1996). NATURAL HISTORY OF SUBFOVEAL SUBRETINAL HEMORRHAGE IN AGERELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-199616030-00001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.