Diagnosis of Reactive Hypoglycemia: Pitfalls in the Use of the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
Abstract
The signs and symptoms of reactive hypoglycemia mimic the manifestations of other clinical disorders. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is a widely accepted diagnostic procedure to evaluate patients suspected of having reactive hypoglycemia. The reproducibility of the OGTT has not been previously assessed in a large group of patients. We evaluated the consistency of glucose nadirs at 50 mg/dl and below during two consecutive OGTTs for diagnostic screening of 59 patients with postprandial symptoms of hypoglycemia. The mean nadirs of the consecutive OGTTs were 56 +/- 12 mg and 57 +/- 13 mg, both significantly below the mean nadir of asymptomatic subjects (P less than .001). The nadir of the first OGTT was at or below 50 mg/dl in a subgroup of 20 patients ("hypoglycemic"). On the repeat OGTT, 13 previously "hypoglycemic" patients had nadirs over 50 mg/dl on the second OGTT. Nine of the 39 remaining patients had nadirs below or equal to 50 mg/dl during their second OGTT. Thus, 37% of all patients had a change in diagnostic classification in the second OGTT based on the glucose nadir level. We conclude that the glucose nadir during OGTT is an inconsistent and unreliable screening criterion for evaluating patients with recurrent postprandial hypoglycemic symptoms in clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
OGTT has been heavily criticized and is no longer recommended for diagnostic purposes.
“As a result, OGTT has been heavily criticized and is no longer recommended for diagnostic purposes [40–42].”
From Spontaneous hypoglycemia: should we mind the gap? Long-term follow-up of healthy people who met Whipple’s triad criteria (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adelmeyer, J., Schauer, C. M., & Kann, P. H. (2024) · Hormones · doi:10.1007/s42000-024-00542-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“As a result, OGTT has been heavily criticized and is no longer recommended for diag - nostic purposes [40 –42].”
- Authors
- CHALEW, S. A., KOETTER, H., HOFFMAN, S., LEVIN, P. A., & KOWARSKI, A. A.
- Venue
- Southern Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Southern Medical Association
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-287
- ISSN
- 0038-4348 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W27944327
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Southern Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-16077)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Keywords
- reactive hypoglycemia, oral glucose tolerance test, diagnostic reproducibility, postprandial hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia screening
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Diagnosis, Differential, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Middle Aged
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review