Cited by 15Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disorders

Diagnosis of Reactive Hypoglycemia: Pitfalls in the Use of the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

CHALEW, STUART A., KOETTER, HANS, HOFFMAN, SHANE, LEVIN, PHILIP A., KOWARSKI, A AVINOAM·1986·Southern Medical Journal

Abstract

The signs and symptoms of reactive hypoglycemia mimic the manifestations of other clinical disorders. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is a widely accepted diagnostic procedure to evaluate patients suspected of having reactive hypoglycemia. The reproducibility of the OGTT has not been previously assessed in a large group of patients. We evaluated the consistency of glucose nadirs at 50 mg/dl and below during two consecutive OGTTs for diagnostic screening of 59 patients with postprandial symptoms of hypoglycemia. The mean nadirs of the consecutive OGTTs were 56 +/- 12 mg and 57 +/- 13 mg, both significantly below the mean nadir of asymptomatic subjects (P less than .001). The nadir of the first OGTT was at or below 50 mg/dl in a subgroup of 20 patients ("hypoglycemic"). On the repeat OGTT, 13 previously "hypoglycemic" patients had nadirs over 50 mg/dl on the second OGTT. Nine of the 39 remaining patients had nadirs below or equal to 50 mg/dl during their second OGTT. Thus, 37% of all patients had a change in diagnostic classification in the second OGTT based on the glucose nadir level. We conclude that the glucose nadir during OGTT is an inconsistent and unreliable screening criterion for evaluating patients with recurrent postprandial hypoglycemic symptoms in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007611-198603000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHALEW, S. A., KOETTER, H., HOFFMAN, S., LEVIN, P. A., & KOWARSKI, A. A.
Venue
Southern Medical Journal
Published
1986-03
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
285-287
ISSN
0038-4348 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W27944327
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Southern Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-16077)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
reactive hypoglycemia, oral glucose tolerance test, diagnostic reproducibility, postprandial hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diagnosis, Differential, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review