The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colorectal Cancer: Metastatic Patterns and Prognosis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Notably, Woollie plausibly identified the most frequent sites of metastatic involvement that are otherwise known to be associated with the evaluated cancers (e.g., brain or bone metastases among the cohort with breast cancer or hepatic metastases for those with colorectal cancer32,33).”
From Large language model trained on clinical oncology data predicts cancer progression (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large language model trained on clinical oncology data predicts cancer progression
Zhu, M., Lin, H., Jiang, J., Jinia, A. J., Jee, J., Pichotta, K., Waters, M., Rose, D., Schultz, N., Chalise, S., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01780-2 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- PATANAPHAN, V., & SALAZAR, O. M.
- Venue
- Southern Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Southern Medical Association
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-41
- ISSN
- 0038-4348 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4236275961
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Southern Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Keywords
- colorectal cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
