Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Cohort Study of Complications, Reoperations, and Resource Use in the Medicare Population

Deyo, Richard A., Ciol, Marcia A., Cherkin, Daniel C., Loeser, John D., Bigos, Stanley J.·1993·Spine

Abstract

Regional variations in lumbar spinal fusion rates suggest a poor consensus on surgical indications. Therefore, complications, costs, and reoperation rates were compared for elderly patients undergoing surgery with or without spinal fusion. Subjects were Medicare recipients who underwent surgery in 1985, with 4 years of subsequent follow-up. There were 27,111 eligible patients, of whom 5.6% had fusions. Mean age was 72 years. Patients undergoing fusion had a complication rate 1.9 times greater than those who had surgery without fusion. The blood transfusion rate was 5.8 times greater, nursing home placement rate 2.2 times greater, and hospital charges 1.5 times higher (all P < 0.0005). Six-week mortality was 2.0 times greater for patients undergoing fusions (P = 0.025). Reoperation rates at 4 years were no lower for patients who had fusion surgery and results were similar in most diagnostic subgroups. Indications for fusion among older patients require better definition, preferably based on outcomes from prospective controlled studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007632-199309010-00010

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Deyo, R. A., Ciol, M. A., Cherkin, D. C., Loeser, J. D., & Bigos, S. J.
Venue
Spine
Published
1993-09
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
1463-1470
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295681930
Cited by
288
References
0
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Cohort Study of Complications, Reoperations, and Resource Use in the Medicare Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199309010-00010
The paper
Deyo, R. A., Ciol, M. A., Cherkin, D. C., Loeser, J. D., & Bigos, S. J. (1993). Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Cohort Study of Complications, Reoperations, and Resource Use in the Medicare Population. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199309010-00010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.