The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stability Increase of the Lumbar Spine With Different Muscle Groups: A Biomechanical In Vitro Study
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: This study investigated the influence of five different muscle groups on the monosegmental motion (L4-L5) during pure flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments. OBJECTIVES: The results showed and compared the effect of different muscle groups acting in different directions on the stability of a single motion segment to find loading conditions for in vitro experiments that simulate more physiologically reasonable loads. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In spine biomechanics research, most in vitro experiments have been carried out without applying muscle forces, even though these forces stabilize the spinal column in vivo. METHODS: Seven human lumbosacral spines were tested in a spine tester that allows simulation of up to five symmetrical muscle forces. Changing pure flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments up to +/- 3.75 Nm were applied without muscle forces, with different muscle groups and combinations. The three-dimensional monosegmental motion was determined using an instrumented spatial linkage system. RESULTS: Simulated muscle forces were found to strongly influence load-deformation characteristics. Muscle action generally decreased the range of motion and the neutral zone of the motion segments. This was most evident for flexion and extension. After five pairs of symmetrical, constant muscle forces were applied (80 N per pair), the range of motion decreased about 93% in flexion and 85% in extension. The total neutral zone for flexion and extension was decreased by 83% muscle action. The multifidus muscle group had the strongest influence. CONCLUSION: This experiment showed the importance of including at least some of the most important muscle groups in in vitro experiments on lumbar spine specimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multifidus Muscle Recovery Is Not Automatic After Resolution of Acute, First-Episode Low Back Pain
Hides, J. A., Richardson, C. A., & Jull, G. A. (1996) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199612010-00011 · Cited by 1,115
Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: effect and possible mechanisms
Hodges, P. W., & Moseley, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/s1050-6411(03)00042-7 · Cited by 649
Electromyographic Analysis of Core Trunk, Hip, and Thigh Muscles During 9 Rehabilitation Exercises
Ekstrom, R. A., Donatelli, R. A., & Carp, K. C. (2007) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2471 · Cited by 594
Validation of the Korean Version of the Oswestry Disability Index
Kim, D.-Y., Lee, S.-H., Lee, H.-Y., Lee, H.-J., Chang, S.-B., Chung, S.-K., & Kim, H.-J. (2005) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000157172.00635.3a · Cited by 554
A hypothesis of chronic back pain: ligament subfailure injuries lead to muscle control dysfunction
Panjabi, M. M. (2006) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0925-3 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilke, H.-J., Wolf, S., Claes, L. E., Arand, M., & Wiesend, A.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-197
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030951562
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability Increase of the Lumbar Spine With Different Muscle Groups: A Biomechanical In Vitro Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199501150-00011
- The paper
- Wilke, H.-J., Wolf, S., Claes, L. E., Arand, M., & Wiesend, A. (1995). Stability Increase of the Lumbar Spine With Different Muscle Groups: A Biomechanical In Vitro Study. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199501150-00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.