The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Absence Resulting From Low Back Trouble Can Be Reduced by Psychosocial Intervention at the Work Place
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A 1-year prospective study in industry, assessing effects of an educational pamphlet on various psychosocial parameters and absenteeism resulting from low back trouble. OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of distributing an educational psychosocial pamphlet to reduce absenteeism resulting from back trouble. The pamphlet was designed to alter avoidance behaviors by encouraging a positive, active approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Attempts to control back-pain disability have failed. Fear of pain and activity seemingly leads to avoidance behaviors than contribute to chronicity and work loss. Avoidance behaviors are mediated by attitudes and beliefs; such attitudes and beliefs are a reasonable target for educational interventions designed to change "inappropriate" behaviors (e.g., extended absenteeism). Health education pamphlets are advocated widely but tested rarely. METHODS: Three factories participated in the study. Psychosocial data were collected by questionnaires; absence data were extracted from company records. A psychosocial pamphlet was distributed in one factory; the control subjects received either a nonspecific pamphlet or no intervention. The pamphlet emphasized a positive approach to low back trouble (reduction of negative beliefs and attitudes). RESULTS: In the company whose employees received pamphlets, a significant reduction occurred for the number of spells with extended absence and the number of days of absence (70% and 60%, respectively) compared with extrapolated values. A concomitant positive shift in beliefs concerning the locus of pain control and the inevitable consequences of low back trouble was found. CONCLUSION: A simple industrial intervention using a psychosocial pamphlet, which was designed to reduce avoidance behaviors by fostering positive beliefs and attitudes, successfully reduced extended absence resulting from low back trouble.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been demonstrated that kinesiophobia has shown to be a strong predictor for pain disability and pain chronicity in the longer term [73] associated with higher rates of sick-leaves [74], pain vigilance and disability as well as decreased physical activity levels [75–77].”
From Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue (2017) · cites this paper as [74]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: Current state of scientific evidence
Leeuw, M., Goossens, M. E. J. B., Linton, S. J., Crombez, G., Boersma, K., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9085-0 · Cited by 2,261
“As was previously demonstrated (Burton et al., 1999; Moore et al., 2000; Symonds et al., 1995), a straightforward educational campaign comprised of the advice to stay active and discouraging medical interventions, resulted in long-lasting reductions in fear avoidance beliefs in the community as…”
BackgroundOccupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review
Waddell, G. F. (2001) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/51.2.124 · Cited by 607
“C3 – There is preliminary evidence that educational interventions which specifically address beliefs and attitudes may reduce future work loss due to LBP [61].”
BackgroundA Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Neurophysiology Education in Chronic Low Back Pain
Moseley, G. L., Nicholas, M. K., & Hodges, P. W. (2004) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200409000-00007 · Cited by 537
“Two notable studies have evaluated education based on the biopsychosocial model, which acknowledges cognitive and behavioral factors.(33,34) One study compared 2 education booklets.”
BackgroundBurton, A., Waddell, G., Tillotson, K., & Summerton, N. (1999) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199912010-00010 · Cited by 622
Self-citationMoseley, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00488-7 · Cited by 530
“Education strategies focusing on currently accurate information about the behavioral response to pain have also reported effectiveness within both a management and a prevention context.(2,5,17) The current results may highlight a lack of pain science education in formal or professional training across the health profe…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Symonds, T. L., Burton, A. K., Tillotson, K. M., & Main, C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Huddersfield (GB)
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Symonds, Tara L.
- Tillotson, K. Malcolm
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2738-2745
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080043403
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Spine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
- Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- low back pain, absenteeism, psychosocial interventions, health education leaflets, avoidance behavior, pain beliefs, locus of control, work loss, industrial workers, chronic pain
- MeSH terms
- Absenteeism, Adult, Fear, Health Surveys, Humans, Pamphlets, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Time Factors, Work, Low Back Pain, Workplace
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review