The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seven- to 10-year Outcome of Decompressive Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review and prospective follow-up of 88 patients who had decompressive laminectomy with or without fusion from 1983 to 1986. OBJECTIVE: To determine the 7- to 10-year outcome of surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is limited information on the impact of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis on symptoms, walking ability, and satisfaction, as well as reoperation. METHODS: Patients completed standardized questionnaires in 1993 that included items about reoperations, back pain, leg pain, walking capacity, and satisfaction with surgery. Associations between preoperative demographic and clinical variables and outcomes 7 to 10 years after surgery were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Average preoperative age was 69 years and eight patients received fusion. Of 88 patients in the original cohort, 20 (23%) were deceased and 20 (23%) had undergone reoperation by 7- to 10-year follow-up. Fifty-five patients answered questionnaires. Average duration of follow-up was 8.1 years. Thirty-three percent of the respondents had severe back pain at follow-up, 53% were unable to walk two blocks, and 75% were satisfied with the results of surgery. The severity of current spine-related symptoms was a stronger correlate of physical functional status at the time of follow-up than age or nonspinal comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Seven to 10 years after decompressive surgery for spinal stenosis, 23% of patients had undergone reoperation and 33% of respondents had severe back pain. Despite a high prevalence of nonspinal problems in this elderly cohort, spinal symptoms were the most important correlate of reduced functional status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Atlas, S. J., Keller, R. B., Wu, Y. A., Deyo, R. A., & Singer, D. E. (2005) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000158953.57966.c0 · Cited by 603
Surgical or Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Malmivaara, A., Slätis, P., Heliövaara, M., Sainio, P., Kinnunen, H., Kankare, J., Dalin-Hirvonen, N., Seitsalo, S., Herno, A., Kortekangas, P., et al. (2007) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d · Cited by 549
Kreiner, D. S., Shaffer, W. O., Baisden, J. L., Gilbert, T. J., Summers, J. T., Toton, J. F., Hwang, S. W., Mendel, R. C., & Reitman, C. A. (2013) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059 · Cited by 517
Thomé, C., Zevgaridis, D., Leheta, O., Bäzner, H., Pöckler-Schöniger, C., Wöhrle, J., & Schmiedek, P. (2005) · Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine · doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0129 · Cited by 371
Predictors of Surgical Outcome in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Katz, J. N., Stucki, G., Lipson, S. J., Fossel, A. H., Grobler, L. J., & Weinstein, J. N. (1999) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199911010-00010 · Cited by 351
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, J. N., Lipson, S. J., Chang, L. C., Levine, S. A., Fossel, A. H., & Liang, M. H.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-97
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330000416
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seven- to 10-year Outcome of Decompressive Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199601010-00022
- The paper
- Katz, J. N., Lipson, S. J., Chang, L. C., Levine, S. A., Fossel, A. H., & Liang, M. H. (1996). Seven- to 10-year Outcome of Decompressive Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199601010-00022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.