The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effects of Abdominal Muscle Coactivation on Lumbar Spine Stability
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical model of the lumbar spine was used to calculate the effects of abdominal muscle coactivation on spinal stability. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effects of abdominal muscle coactivation on lumbar spine stability, muscle fatigue rate, and lumbar spine compression forces. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The activation of human trunk muscles has been found to involve coactivation of antagonistic muscles, which has not been adequately predicted by biomechanical models. Antagonistic activation of abdominal muscles might produce flexion moments resulting from abdominal pressurization. Qualitatively, antagonistic activity also has been attributed to the need to stabilize the spine. METHODS: Spinal loads and spinal stability were calculated for maximum and submaximum (40%, 60% and 80%) efforts in extension and lateral bending using a previously published, anatomically realistic biomechanical model of the lumbar spine and its musculature. Three different antagonistic abdominal muscle coactivation patterns were imposed, and results were compared with those found in a model with no imposed coactivation. RESULTS: Results were quantified in terms of the sum of cubed muscle stresses (sigma sigma m3, which is related to the muscle fatigue rate), the maximum compressive loading on the lumbar spine, and the critical value of the muscle stiffness parameter (q) required for the spine to be stable. Forcing antagonistic coactivation increased stability, but at the cost of an increase in sigma sigma m3 and a small increase in maximum spinal compression. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses provide estimates of the effects of antagonistic abdominal muscle coactivation, indicating that its probable role is to stabilize the spine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: effect and possible mechanisms
Hodges, P. W., & Moseley, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/s1050-6411(03)00042-7 · Cited by 649
van Dieën, J. H., Cholewicki, J., & Radebold, A. (2003) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000058939.51147.55 · Cited by 466
Larivière, C., Gagnon, D., & Loisel, P. (2000) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/s1050-6411(99)00027-9 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner-Morse, M. G., & Stokes, I. A. F.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-91
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2335616795
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Abdominal Muscle Coactivation on Lumbar Spine Stability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199801010-00019
- The paper
- Gardner-Morse, M. G., & Stokes, I. A. F. (1998). The Effects of Abdominal Muscle Coactivation on Lumbar Spine Stability. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199801010-00019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.