The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effectiveness of Acupuncture in the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of acupuncture for the management of nonspecific low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Acupuncture is one of the oldest forms of therapy, but little is known about the effectiveness of acupuncture for low back pain. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were done to assess the effectiveness of all types of acupuncture treatment, which involves needling for subjects with nonspecific low back pain. Two reviewers blinded with respect to authors, institution, and journal independently assessed the methodologic quality of the studies. Because data were statistically and clinically too heterogeneous, a qualitative review was performed. The evidence was classified into four levels: strong, moderate, limited, or no evidence. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Overall, the methodologic quality was low. Only two studies met the preset "high quality" level for this review. No study clearly evaluated acupuncture for acute low back pain. The results indicate that there was no evidence showing acupuncture to be more effective than no treatment. There was moderate evidence indicating that acupuncture is not more effective than trigger-point injection or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and there was limited evidence that acupuncture is not more effective than placebo or sham acupuncture for the management of chronic low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Because this systematic review did not clearly indicate that acupuncture is effective in the management of back pain, the authors would not recommend acupuncture as a regular treatment for patients with low back pain. There clearly is a need for more high-quality randomized controlled trials.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Begg, C. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030 · Cited by 3,127
1987 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences: A New Clinical Model for the Treatment of Low-Back Pain
Waddell, G. (1987) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198709000-00002 · Cited by 1,244
Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German
Egger, M., Zellweger-Zähner, T., Schneider, M., Junker, C., Lengeler, C., & Antes, G. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)02419-7 · Cited by 1,028
Conservative Treatment of Acute and Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
van Tulder, M. W., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (1997) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199709150-00012 · Cited by 981
Self-citationAllen, B. L., Ferguson, R. L., Lehmann, T. R., & OʼBRIEN, R. P. (1982) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198200710-00001 · Cited by 792
A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands
van Tulder, M. W., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00272-g · Cited by 760
Self-citationvan Tulder, M. W., Assendelft, W. J., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (1997) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199710150-00001 · Cited by 727
Self-citationMoher, D., Fortin, P. R., Jadad, A. R., Jüni, P., Klassen, T. P., LeLorier, J., Liberati, A., Penna, A., & Linde, K. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90538-3 · Cited by 539
Grégoire, G., Derderian, F., & LeLorier, J. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)00098-b · Cited by 521
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Duplan, 1983, La Semaine des Hôpitaux de Paris, 59, 3109
- Hackett, 1988, Practitioner, 232, 163
- Li, 1994, Rhumatologie, 46, 11
- Lopacz, 1979, Neurol Neurochir Pol, 8, 405
- MacDonald, 1983, Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl, 65, 44
- Mendelson, 1978, Clin Exp Neurol, 15, 182
- Spitzer, 1987, Spine, 7, 1
- von Mencke, 1988, Akupunktur, 4, 204
- von Mencke, 1989, Akupunktur, 5, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials
Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Moseley, A. M., & Elkins, M. (2003) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/83.8.713 · Cited by 4,808
Deyo, R. A., & Weinstein, J. N. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200102013440508 · Cited by 1,675
What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 · Cited by 1,203
Chou, R., & Huffman, L. H. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007 · Cited by 1,045
Acupuncture: Theory, Efficacy, and Practice
Kaptchuk, T. J. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00010 · Cited by 964
Metadata
- Authors
- van Tulder, M. W., Cherkin, D. C., Berman, B., Lao, L., & Koes, B. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- Koes, Bart W.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1113-1123
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102326175
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 44.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Spine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
- Keywords
- acupuncture, low back pain, non-specific low back pain, chronic low back pain, acute low back pain, treatment effectiveness, sham acupuncture, placebo, trigger point injection, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, methodological quality of trials
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Humans, Research Design, Acupuncture Analgesia, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
