Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TRANSPLANTED ACELLULAR ALLOGRAFT DERMAL MATRIX: Potential as a Template for the Reconstruction of Viable Dermis

Livesey, Stephen A., Herndon, David N., Hollyoak, Maureen A., Atkinson, Yvelle H., Nag, Abhijit·1995·Transplantation

Abstract

The use of allograft donor skin as a permanent skin transplant in full-thickness burns is limited by its immunogenic properties and by the inappropriateness of immunosuppression of a burn patient. Allograft skin will initially take on a full-thickness wound, but it is ultimately rejected. This immunogenic response to allograft skin is directed primarily against the cells of the epidermis and the endothelial cells in the dermis. To date, it has not been possible to remove these immunogenic cells while maintaining the integrity of the nonimmunogenic components of allograft dermis. In this study, we have investigated a method of processing porcine skin to produce an acellular, structurally intact, dermal matrix. We have developed a process that de-epidermizes and decellularizes fresh porcine skin, while maintaining the basement membrane complex and the extracellular matrix structure of the dermis. Porcine dermis processed by this method was initially assessed for toxicity in a rat subcutaneous implant study. In vivo assessment confirmed the absence of local and systemic toxicity. Subsequently, we investigated the potential use of this matrix in combination with a meshed split-thickness autograft (STSG) as a permanent allograft in full-thickness wounds in pigs. Histological analysis revealed that the dermal matrix supported fibroblast infiltration, neovascularization, and keratinocyte migration from an overlying STSG. There was no evidence of an inflammatory cell infiltrate or a cell-mediated immune response. This apparent lack of an immune response was also tested in vitro by assessing recipient lymphocyte proliferation in response to an extract of the dermal matrix. These results suggest that skin processed by this method has the potential to be used as a permanent dermal allograft to augment the performance of an STSG in the closure of full-thickness wounds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007890-199507150-00001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Livesey, S. A., Herndon, D. N., Hollyoak, M. A., Atkinson, Y. H., & Nag, A.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
1995-07
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071659375
Cited by
428
References
0
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TRANSPLANTED ACELLULAR ALLOGRAFT DERMAL MATRIX: Potential as a Template for the Reconstruction of Viable Dermis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007890-199507150-00001
The paper
Livesey, S. A., Herndon, D. N., Hollyoak, M. A., Atkinson, Y. H., & Nag, A. (1995). TRANSPLANTED ACELLULAR ALLOGRAFT DERMAL MATRIX: Potential as a Template for the Reconstruction of Viable Dermis. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199507150-00001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.