The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A sensitivity and specificity analysis of the surface microscopy features of invasive melanoma
Abstract
In vivo cutaneous surface microscopy, epiluminescence microscopy, dermoscopy, dermatoscopy and magnified oil immersion diascopy, are terms that describe the use of an incident light magnification system to examine cutaneous lesions, usually with immersion oil at the skin-microscope interface. The result is the visualization of a multitude of morphological features, not visible with the naked eye, that enhance the clinical diagnosis of nearly all pigmented lesions. Sixty-two invasive melanomas and 159 randomly selected non-melanoma pigmented lesions were used in the study. The non-melanomas, while randomly selected from a large data base, were all clinically atypical. Using the x 10 magnification of hand-held surface microscopes (Dermatoscope, Episcope), we present an analysis of 72 surface microscopic variables (constituting over 15,000 single observations) for the diagnosis of invasive melanoma. Forty of the 72 features studied were shown to differ significantly between invasive melanoma and non-melanoma pigmented lesions. Blue-white veil, multiple brown dots, radial streaming and pseudopods had a specificity greater than 95% for melanoma. Two features, symmetrically irregular pigment (non-uniform pigmentation with point and axial symmetry) and the presence of a single colour, had a sensitivity of 0%, i.e. were absent, in melanoma. The other significant features are presented, with their sensitivity and specificity for melanoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy
Kittler, H., Pehamberger, H., Wolff, K., & Binder, M. (2002) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00679-4 · Cited by 1,349
Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions – a valuable tool for early
Argenziano, G., & Soyer, H. P. (2001) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(00)00422-8 · Cited by 391
ABCDE - an evolving concept in the early detection of melanoma
Rigel, D. S., Friedman, R. J., Kopf, A. W., & Polsky, D. (2005) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.141.8.1032 · Cited by 189
Piccolo, D., Ferrari, A., Peris, K., Daidone, R., Ruggeri, B., & Chimenti, S. (2002) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04978.x · Cited by 159
Bono, A., Tolomio, E., Trincone, S., Bartoli, C., Tomatis, S., Carbone, A., & Santinami, M. (2006) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07396.x · Cited by 78
(2013) · PubMed · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Menzies, S. W., Ingvar, C., & McCarthy, W. H.
- Venue
- Melanoma Research
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-62
- ISSN
- 0960-8931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029592256
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.