The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of anthropometric factors and breast cancer risk
Open accessAbstract
Epidemiological evidence implicating anthropometric risk factors in breast cancer aetiology is accumulating. For premenopausal women, breast cancer risk increases with increasing height, but decreases with higher weight or body mass index, and no association with increased central adiposity exists. For postmenopausal women, an increased risk of breast cancer is found with increasing levels of all the anthropometric variables including height, weight, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, waist circumference and weight gain. Weight loss appears to decrease risk, particularly if it occurs later in life. Breast size may be a risk factor for breast cancer, however, the current evidence is inconclusive. Several hypothesized biologic mechanisms exist to explain how anthropometric factors influence breast cancer risk. Obesity may increase levels of circulating endogenous sex hormones, insulin and insulin-like growth factors that all, in turn, increase breast cancer risk. Genetic predisposition to obesity and to specific body fat distributions are also implicated. With obesity, there are increased levels of fat tissue that can store toxins and can serve as a continuous source of carcinogens. Recommendations for future research on anthropometric factors and breast cancer are provided. Sufficient evidence exists to support strategies to avoid weight gain throughout life as a means of reducing postmenopausal breast cancer risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994
Flegal, K., Carroll, M., Kuczmarski, R., & Johnson, C. (1998) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0800541 · Cited by 3,045
Validity of Self-Reported Waist and Hip Circumferences in Men and Women
Rimm, E. B., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Chute, C. G., Litin, L. B., & Willett, W. C. (1990) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199011000-00009 · Cited by 1,015
Genetic and Nongenetic Determinants of Regional Fat Distribution
BOUCHARD, C., DESPRÉS, J.-P., & MAURIÈGE, P. (1993) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.14.1.72 · Cited by 486
Okosun, I. S., Liao, Y., Rotimi, C. N., Prewitt, T. E., & Cooper, R. S. (2000) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00045-4 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Kushi, L. H., Byers, T., Doyle, C., Bandera, E. V., McCullough, M., Gansler, T., Andrews, K. S., Thun, M. J., & The American Cancer Society 2006 Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2006) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.56.5.254 · Cited by 1,901
Physical activity and cancer prevention: etiologic evidence and biological mechanisms
Friedenreich, C. M., & Orenstein, M. R. (2002) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/132.11.3456s · Cited by 699
Self-citationObesity and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Olsen, C. M., Green, A. C., Whiteman, D. C., Sadeghi, S., Kolahdooz, F., & Webb, P. M. (2007) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.11.010 · Cited by 337
Byers, T., Nestle, M., McTiernan, A., Doyle, C., Currie-Williams, A., Gansler, T., & Thun, M. (2002) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.52.2.92 · Cited by 336
Neilson, H. K., Friedenreich, C. M., Brockton, N. T., & Millikan, R. C. (2009) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0756 · Cited by 232
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedenreich, C. M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer Prevention
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-32
- ISSN
- 0959-8278 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073707527
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.