Cited by 329Arsenic contamination and mitigationEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesHeavy metals in environment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

AN INVESTIGATION OF ARSENATE AND ARSENITE BONDING STRUCTURES ON GOETHITE BY FTIR

Sun, Xiaohua, Doner, Harvey E.·1996·Soil Science

Abstract

The bonding structures of arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) on goethite (α-FeOOH) were studied by Transmission-Fourier Transform Infrared (T-FTIR) and Attenuated Total Reflectance-FTIR (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. ATR-FTIR spectra of deuterated goethite showed three bands of OD stretch, corresponding to singly, doubly, and triply coordinated OH hydroxyls on the goethite surface. Both FTIR modes provided similar structural information for arsenic adsorption. Most arsenate and arsenite oxyanions replaced two singly coordinated surface OH groups (A-type) to form binuclear bridging complexes Fe-O-AsO(OH)-O-Fe and Fe-O-As(OH)-O-Fe. However, their effects on doubly (C-type) and triply (B-type) coordinated surface OH groups are different. As(III) mainly reacted with C-type OH groups, whereas As(V) reacted with B-type OH groups. These reactions may be attributed to hydrogen-bonding and/or chemical bonding. Finally, we applied a sequential extraction method to evaluate the fractions with different bonding strengths. Relatively strong chemical extraction was necessary to remove 75 to 80% of adsorbed arsenite or arsenate from goethite. The strong retention of As(III) and As(V) is most likely caused by the formation of binuclear complexes with goethite.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00010694-199612000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 329

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Anderson, 1976, J Colloid Interface Sci, 54, 391, 10.1016/0021-9797(76)90318-0 · DOI
  2. Atkinson, 1968, J Inorg Nucl Chem, 30, 2371, 10.1016/0022-1902(68)80247-7 · DOI
  3. Chao, 1984, J Geochem Explor, 20, 101, 10.1016/0375-6742(84)90078-5 · DOI
  4. Deuel, 1972, J Environ Qual, 1, 317, 10.2134/jeq1972.00472425000100030026x · DOI
  5. Ferguson, 1972, Water Res, 6, 1259, 10.1016/0043-1354(72)90052-8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Glaubig, 1988, Soil Sci Soc AmJ, 52, 536, 10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200020044x · DOI
  7. Gruebel, 1988, Soil Sci Soc AmJ, 52, 390, 10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200020016x · DOI
  8. Gupta, 1978, JWater Pollut Control Fed, 50, 493
  9. Heilman, 1965, Soi Sci, 100, 409, 10.1097/00010694-196512000-00006 · DOI
  10. Hingston, 1974, J Soil Sci, 25, 16, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1974.tb01098.x · DOI
  11. Holm, 1979, Am Chem Soc Symp Ser, 93, 711
  12. Hunter, 1994, Environ Sci Technol, 28, 686, 10.1021/es00053a024 · DOI
  13. Johnston, 1979, Soil Sci Soc AmJ, 43, 304, 10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300020013x · DOI
  14. Livesey, 1981, Soil Sci, 131, 88, 10.1097/00010694-198102000-00004 · DOI
  15. Lumsdon, 1984, J Soil Sci, 35, 381, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1984.tb00294.x · DOI
  16. Manceau, 1995, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 59, 3647, 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00275-5 · DOI
  17. Matthew, 1982, Water Res, 16, 1247, 10.1016/0043-1354(82)90143-9 · DOI
  18. Parfitt, 1976, J Chem Soc Farady Trans, 172, 1082, 10.1039/f19767201082 · DOI
  19. Pickering, 1981, CRC Crit Rev Anal Chem, 12, 233, 10.1080/10408348108085519 · DOI
  20. Russell, 1975, Nature, 248, 220, 10.1038/248220a0 · DOI
  21. Schwertmann, 1984, Clay Miner, 19, 9, 10.1180/claymin.1984.019.1.02 · DOI
  22. Sperline, 1987, Langmuir, 3, 198, 10.1021/la00074a009 · DOI
  23. Torrent, 1990, Soil Sci Soc Am J, 54, 1007, 10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400040012x · DOI
  24. Waychunas, 1993, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 57, 2251, 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90567-G · DOI
  25. Waychunas, 1995, Geochim Gosmochim Acta, 59, 3655, 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00276-6 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sun, X., & Doner, H. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Soil Science
Published
1996-12
Volume
161
Issue
12
Pages
865-872
ISSN
0038-075X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334317903
Cited by
329
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
arsenite, arsenate, goethite, arsenic adsorption, surface hydroxyl groups, arsenic speciation, hydrogen bonding, sequential extraction, iron oxyhydroxide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review