Cited by 45Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ADVERSE EFFECTS OF PROLONGED BENZODIAZEPINE USE

Ashton, Heather·1986·Adverse Drug Reaction Bulletin

Abstract

Honorary Consultant in Clinical Pharmacology, Newcastle Health Authority; Senior Lecturer in Psychopharmacology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00012995-198606000-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Ashton, H.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ashton, Heather
Venue
Adverse Drug Reaction Bulletin
Published
1986-06
Volume
118
Issue
1
Pages
440-443
ISSN
0044-6394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007397780
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Adverse Drug Reaction Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
benzodiazepines, adverse drug reactions, prolonged drug use, drug addiction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review