The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality of Life Technologies for People With Dementia
Abstract
The article presents the results of user research into the quality of life in dementia and outlines priorities for research and development for technologies to enhance the independence and well-being of people with dementia. The article describes prototype music players—1 of 4 technologies currently under development by INDEPENDENT, a government-funded research project in the United Kingdom. The user research indicates that while a person's functional and cognitive deficits are of considerable importance, quality of life encompasses wider contextual issues, such as the physical, social, and technological environment, offering many avenues for technology and design interventions that may facilitate participation in everyday activities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to References [23] and [57], there are three generations of technology designed for supporting the independent living of older adults, which we describe here.”
From Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for Aging Well: A Scoping Review (2016) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Sixsmith, 2006, Alzheimers Care Q, 7, 194
- Hofman, 1991, Int J Epidemiol, 20, 736, 10.1093/ije/20.3.736 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferri, 2005, Lancet, 366, 211, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66910-3 · DOI
- Bond, 1999, Ageing Soc, 19, 561, 10.1017/S0144686X99007473 · doi:10.1017/s0144686x99007473
- Blackman, 2003, Disabil Soc, 18, 357, 10.1080/0968759032000052914 · DOI
- Orpwood, 2005, Universal Access Inf Soc, 4, 156, 10.1007/s10209-005-0120-7 · DOI
- Sixsmith, 2007, Ageing Soc, 27, 127, 10.1017/S0144686X06005228 · DOI
Cited by
Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for Aging Well: A Scoping Review
Blackman, S., Matlo, C., Bobrovitskiy, C., Waldoch, A., Fang, M. L., Jackson, P., Mihailidis, A., Nygård, L., Astell, A., & Sixsmith, A. (2016) · Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1515/jisys-2014-0136 · Cited by 269
Self-citationHattink, B. J. J., Meiland, F. J. M., Overmars-Marx, T., de Boer, M., Ebben, P. W. G., van Blanken, M., Verhaeghe, S., Stalpers-Croeze, I., Jedlitschka, A., Flick, S. E., et al. (2016) · Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.932022 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Sixsmith, A., Orpwood, R., & Torrington, J.
- Venue
- Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-93
- ISSN
- 0882-7524
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
