The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option?
Abstract
Stroke is the leading cause of disability, despite continued advances in prevention and treatment techniques based on novel delivery of new fibrinolytic drugs. Improved medical treatment of the complications caused by acute stroke has contributed to decreased mortality, but 90% of the survivors have significant neurological deficits. Reducing the degree of permanent disability remains the goal of poststroke neuro-rehabilitation programs, and new approaches to impairment reduction through managing sensorimotor experience may contribute further to altering disability. Recent reports from a number of laboratories using enhanced sensorimotor training protocols, particularly those with robotic devices, have indicated modest success in reducing impairment and increasing motor power in the exercised limb of patients with stroke when compared with control individuals. Whether arming the therapist with new tools, especially robotic devices, to treat impairment is a realistic approach to modern interdisciplinary rehabilitation raises questions regarding the added value of impairment reduction, and under what conditions should scientific and clinical development of robotic studies continue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model
Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-07-01688.1985 · Cited by 4,395
Self-citationImpedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory
Hogan, N. (1985) · Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control · doi:10.1115/1.3140702 · Cited by 3,673
Self-citationNudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
Cited by
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J., & Krebs, H. I. (2008) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968307305457 · Cited by 1,503
Self-citationRehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy
Krebs, H. I., Palazzolo, J. J., Dipietro, L., Ferraro, M., Krol, J., Rannekleiv, K., Volpe, B. T., & Hogan, N. (2003) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1024494031121 · Cited by 714
Self-citationRobot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Robot for Wrist Rehabilitation
Krebs, H. I., Volpe, B. T., Williams, D., Celestino, J., Charles, S. K., Lynch, D., & Hogan, N. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2007.903899 · Cited by 553
Self-citationARMin III – Arm Therapy Exoskeleton with an Ergonomic Shoulder Actuation
Nef, T., Guidali, M., & Riener, R. (2009) · Applied Bionics and Biomechanics · doi:10.1080/11762320902840179 · Cited by 522
Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke
Fasoli, S. E., Krebs, H. I., Stein, J., Frontera, W. R., & Hogan, N. (2003) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50110 · Cited by 512
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Volpe, B. T., Krebs, H. I., & Hogan, N.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Neurology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 745-752
- ISSN
- 1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977373229
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00019052-200112000-00011
- The paper
- Volpe, B. T., Krebs, H. I., & Hogan, N. (2001). Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Current Opinion in Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019052-200112000-00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.