Cited by 333Dermatologic Treatments and ResearchLaser Applications in Dentistry and MedicineAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects

The Use of Fractional Laser Photothermolysis for the Treatment of Atrophic Scars

ALSTER, TINA S., TANZI, ELIZABETH L., LAZARUS, MELISSA·2007·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrophic scars commonly seek treatment for their removal but are often concerned about the prolonged recovery, short-lived results, and/or ineffectiveness of available therapies. A novel treatment using a 1,550-nm erbium-doped fiber laser to induce fractional photothermolysis of treated skin has been used to resurface photodamaged skin but has not been studied previously in patients with atrophic scars to determine its effectiveness for this condition. PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of 1,550-nm erbium-doped fiber laser treatment on atrophic scars. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (skin phototypes I-V) with mild to moderate atrophic facial acne scars received monthly treatment with a 1,550-nm erbium-doped fiber laser (Fraxel, Reliant Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA). Clinical response to treatment was determined at each treatment visit and 6 months after the final treatment session by two independent assessors using a quartile grading scale. Side effects and patient satisfaction were monitored at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: Clinical improvement averaged 51% to 75% in nearly 90% of patients after three monthly laser treatments. Mean improvement scores increased proportionately with each successive laser session. Clinical response rates were independent of age, gender, or skin phototype. Side effects included transient erythema and edema in most patients, but no dyspigmentation, ulceration, or scarring. CONCLUSIONS: Atrophic scars c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00042728-200703000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ALSTER, T. S., TANZI, E. L., & LAZARUS, M.
Affiliations
Washington Institute of Dermatologic Laser Surgery (US)
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2007-03
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
295-299
ISSN
1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010211640
Cited by
333
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 36
FWCI
34.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Keywords
atrophic scars, acne scars, fractional photothermolysis, erbium-doped fiber laser, treatment safety, adverse effects, patient satisfaction, skin resurfacing
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adult, Aged, Cicatrix, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phototherapy, Dose Fractionation, Radiation, Laser Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review