The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sexual abuse is more frequently reported by IBS patients than by patients with organic digestive diseases or controls. Results of a multicentre inquiry
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this multicentre inquiry was to evaluate the prevalence of sexual abuse among IBS patients consulting a gastroenterologist, in comparison to healthy controls and patients with organic digestive diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS; Rome Criteria) were included by eight university hospitals (n = 196; 41.2 +/- 20.6 years; sex ratio (M/F) = 0.23). Control groups were: (i) patients consulting for the follow-up of non-neoplastic organic digestive diseases (n = 135; 41.5 +/- 17.0 years; 1.21); (ii) patients attending ophthalmology units (n = 200; 43.8 +/- 20.7 years; 0.81); (iii) healthy subjects seen in centres of the National Health System (n = 172; 40.3 +/- 16.3 years; 0.83). Each patient filled in an anonymous questionnaire, without help. Prevalence of sexual abuse in the various groups was compared by the chi 2 test. RESULTS: Sixty-two instance of sexual abuse (55 females, 7 males) were recorded among the 196 IBS patients (31.6%); 8 cases of verbal aggression, 4 of exhibitionism, 11 of sexual harassment, 22 sexual touches, 17 rapes. The prevalence of sexual abuse was 14.0% for the patients with organic digestive diseases (P = 0.0005 vs. IBS), 12.5% among ophthalmology patients (P < 0.0001) and 7.6% in healthy controls (P < 0.0001). Sexual abuse was accompanied by physical abuse in 23 IBS patients and 19 patients from control groups (not significant). Twenty-six IBS patients reported isolated physical abuse (14.7%) versus 40 from control groups (8.8%; P = 0.041). There was a significant trend towards more severe attacks of abuse among IBS patients than in others. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the high prevalence of sexual abuse among IBS patients consulting in Gastroenterology. Some of these patients would benefit from appropriate therapy. (In the majority of cases, this will be psychotherapy.)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Early life experiences (e.g., abuse), adult stressors (e.g., divorce or bereavement), lack of social support, and other social learning experiences can affect both an individual’s physiological and psychological responses, and may precipitate abdominal distress, as well as psychiatric disorders (4,7–11).”
From Psychosocial Distress and Somatic Symptoms in Community Subjects With Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Psychological Component Is the Rule (2009) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sexual abuse and lifetime diagnosis of psychiatric disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Chen, L. P., Murad, M. H., Paras, M. L., Colbenson, K. M., Sattler, A. L., Goranson, E. N., Elamin, M. B., Seime, R. J., Shinozaki, G., Prokop, L. J., et al. (2010) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/mcp.2009.0583 · Cited by 1,056
Psychosocial Aspects of the Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
Levy, R. L., Olden, K. W., Naliboff, B. D., Bradley, L. A., Francisconi, C., Drossman, D. A., & Creed, F. (2006) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.057 · Cited by 776
Psychological Trauma and Functional Somatic Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Afari, N., Ahumada, S. M., Wright, L. J., Mostoufi, S., Golnari, G., Reis, V., & Cuneo, J. G. (2014) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000010 · Cited by 572
Irritable bowel syndrome: a little understood organic bowel disease?
Talley, N. J., & Spiller, R. E. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09712-x · Cited by 304
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of the irritable bowel syndrome
Jones, J. R. A., Boorman, J., Cann, P., Forbes, A., Gomborone, J., Heaton, K., Hungin, P., Kumar, D., Libby, G., Spiller, R. E., et al. (2000) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.47.suppl_2.ii1 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Delvaux, M., Denis, P., & Allemand, H.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
- Hôpital Charles-Nicolle (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
- Venue
- European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 345-352
- ISSN
- 0954-691X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004741861
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Keywords
- irritable bowel syndrome, sexual abuse, prevalence, physical abuse, sexual harassment, rape, verbal aggression, abuse severity, psychotherapy, gastroenterology patients, Rome criteria, healthy controls comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Colonic Diseases, Functional, Digestive System Diseases, Female, Follow-Up Studies, France, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sex Offenses, Prevalence, Domestic Violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review