Cited by 93Electronic Health Records SystemsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsMedical Coding and Health Information

Safety Issues Related to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR): Synthesis of the Literature from the Last Decade, 2000-2009

Harrington, Linda, Kennerly, Donald, Johnson, Constance·2011·Journal of Healthcare Management

Abstract

Healthcare is a complex industry burdened by numerous and complicated clinical and administrative transactions that require many behavioral changes by patients, clinicians, and provider organizations. While healthcare information technology (HIT) is intended to relieve some of the burden by reducing errors, several aspects of systems such as the electronic medical record (EMR) may actually increase the incidence of certain types of errors or produce new safety risks that result in harm. Healthcare leaders must appreciate the complexity surrounding EMRs and understand the safety issues in order to mandate sound EMR design, development, implementation, and use. This article seeks to inform executives, clinicians, and technology professionals what has been learned through published research on the safety of HIT systems during the last decade, focusing on computerized physician order entry (CPOE), clinical decision support systems (CDSS), and bar-coded medication administration (BCMA).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00115514-201101000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 93

Authors
Harrington, L., Kennerly, D., & Johnson, C.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Journal of Healthcare Management
Published
2011-01
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
31-44
ISSN
1096-9012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2185052693
Cited by
93
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Healthcare Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, health information technology, patient safety, computerized physician order entry, clinical decision support systems, medical errors
MeSH terms
Review Literature as Topic, United States, Safety Management, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review