Cited by 42Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceInnovations in Medical EducationCompetency Development and Evaluation

Good to Great: Using 360-Degree Feedback to Improve Physician Emotional Intelligence

Hammerly, Milton E., Harmon, Larry, Schwaitzberg, Steven D.·2014·Journal of Healthcare Management

Abstract

The past decade has seen intense interest and dramatic change in how hospitals and physician organizations review physician behaviors. The characteristics of successful physicians extend past their technical and cognitive skills. Two of the six core clinical competencies (professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills) endorsed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Board of Medical Specialties, and The Joint Commission require physicians to succeed in measures associated with emotional intelligence (EI). Using 360-degree anonymous feedback surveys to screen for improvement opportunities in these two core competencies enables organizations to selectively offer education to further develop physician EI. Incorporating routine use of these tools and interventions into ongoing professional practice evaluation and focused professional practice evaluation processes may be a cost-effective strategy for preventing disruptive behaviors and increasing the likelihood of success when transitioning to an employed practice model. On the basis of a literature review, we determined that physician EI plays a key role in leadership; teamwork; and clinical, financial, and organizational outcomes. This finding has significant implications for healthcare executives seeking to enhance physician alignment and transition to a team-based delivery model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00115514-201409000-00009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammerly, M. E., Harmon, L., & Schwaitzberg, S. D.
Venue
Journal of Healthcare Management
Published
2014-09
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
354-366
ISSN
1096-9012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1598559218
Cited by
42
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Healthcare Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
Keywords
emotional intelligence, 360-degree feedback, physician performance evaluation, professionalism, interpersonal communication skills, physician leadership, teamwork, physician training
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Humans, Medical Staff, Hospital, Staff Development, Feedback, Psychological, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review