The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing Problem-Based Learning with Case-Based Learning: Effects of a Major Curricular Shift at Two Institutions
Abstract
PURPOSE: Problem-based learning (PBL) is now used at many medical schools to promote lifelong learning, open inquiry, teamwork, and critical thinking. PBL has not been compared with other forms of discussion-based small-group learning. Case-based learning (CBL) uses a guided inquiry method and provides more structure during small-group sessions. In this study, we compared faculty and medical students' perceptions of traditional PBL with CBL after a curricular shift at two institutions. METHOD: Over periods of three years, the medical schools at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and the University of California, Davis (UCD) changed first-, second-, and third-year Doctoring courses from PBL to CBL formats. Ten months after the shift (2001 at UCLA and 2004 at UCD), students and faculty who had participated in both curricula completed a 24-item questionnaire about their PBL and CBL perceptions and the perceived advantages of each format RESULTS: A total of 286 students (86%-97%) and 31 faculty (92%-100%) completed questionnaires. CBL was preferred by students (255; 89%) and faculty (26; 84%) across schools and learner levels. The few students preferring PBL (11%) felt it encouraged self-directed learning (26%) and valued its greater opportunities for participation (32%). From logistic regression, students preferred CBL because of fewer unfocused tangents (59%, odds ration [OR] 4.10, P = .01), less busy-work (80%, OR 3.97, P = .01), and more opportunities for clinical skills application (52%, OR 25.6, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Learners and faculty at two major academic medical centers overwhelmingly preferred CBL (guided inquiry) over PBL (open inquiry). Given the dense medical curriculum and need for efficient use of student and faculty time, CBL offers an alternative model to traditional PBL small-group teaching. This study could not assess which method produces better practicing physicians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maudsley, G. (1999) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199902000-00016 · Cited by 367
Cited by
Thistlethwaite, J. E., Davies, D., Ekeocha, S., Kidd, J. M., MacDougall, C., Matthews, P., Purkis, J., & Clay, D. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.680939 · Cited by 1,241
Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning and its Relationships with Self-Regulated Learning
Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7 · Cited by 882
McLean, S. F. (2016) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.4137/jmecd.s20377 · Cited by 759
Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education
Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316670999 · Cited by 346
What Training Is Needed in the Fourth Year of Medical School? Views of Residency Program Directors
Lyss-Lerman, P., Teherani, A., Aagaard, E., Loeser, H., Cooke, M., & Harper, G. M. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181a82426 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Srinivasan, M., Wilkes, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., & Slavin, S.
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-82
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024923650
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing Problem-Based Learning with Case-Based Learning: Effects of a Major Curricular Shift at Two Institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.acm.0000249963.93776.aa
- The paper
- Srinivasan, M., Wilkes, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., & Slavin, S. (2007). Comparing Problem-Based Learning with Case-Based Learning: Effects of a Major Curricular Shift at Two Institutions. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.acm.0000249963.93776.aa
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.