The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomized comparative trial of tenofovir DF or abacavir as replacement for a thymidine analogue in persons with lipoatrophy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term antiretroviral therapy, while dramatically reducing HIV-related morbidity and mortality, is associated with metabolic and morphological changes. Peripheral fat loss, lipoatrophy, appears most associated with prolonged therapy with thymidine nucleoside analogues. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, comparative study of switching from a thymidine nucleoside analogue to either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) or abacavir in 105 individuals on successful antiretroviral therapy with clinically evident moderate to severe lipoatrophy. RESULTS: Individuals were randomized to tenofovir DF (52) or abacavir (53). The switch was well tolerated and the majority of patients completed 48 weeks of study. One individual in the tenofovir DF group and three in the abacavir group discontinued due to drug-related adverse events. Both groups similarly maintained virological control. Limb fat mass increased similarly in both groups: mean increases by week 48 of 329 and 483 g in tenofovir DF and abacavir groups, respectively [mean 95% confidence interval for difference, -154.3 (range -492.8 to 184.3)]. This change from baseline was statistically significant in both groups (tenofovir DF, P = 0.01; abacavir, P = 0.0001). Mean total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides improved modestly with switching to tenofovir DF but were unchanged with abacavir. The changes in these parameters were significantly greater in the tenofovir DF arm relative to abacavir. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from a thymidine nucleoside analogue to either tenofovir DF or abacavir leads to significant improvement in limb fat mass over 48 weeks. Tenofovir DF may have modest advantages over abacavir for changes in lipids. Peripheral lipoatrophy, when clinically apparent, resolves slowly following treatment switching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Metformin: An Old But Still the Best Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes
Rojas, L. B. A., & Gomes, M. B. (2013) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/1758-5996-5-6 · Cited by 567
Abacavir–Lamivudine versus Tenofovir–Emtricitabine for Initial HIV-1 Therapy
Sax, P. E., Tierney, C., Collier, A. C., Fischl, M. A., Mollan, K., Peeples, L., Godfrey, C., Jahed, N. C., Myers, L., Katzenstein, D., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0906768 · Cited by 313
Sheth, S. H., & Larson, R. J. (2010) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-183 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Moyle, G. J., Sabin, C. A., Cartledge, J., Johnson, M., Wilkins, E., Churchill, D., Hay, P., Fakoya, A., Murphy, M., Scullard, G., Leen, C., & Reilly, G.
- Venue
- AIDS
- Published
- 2006-10-24
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2043-2050
- ISSN
- 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997900349
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized comparative trial of tenofovir DF or abacavir as replacement for a thymidine analogue in persons with lipoatrophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aids.0000247574.33998.03
- The paper
- Moyle, G. J., Sabin, C. A., Cartledge, J., Johnson, M., Wilkins, E., Churchill, D., Hay, P., Fakoya, A., Murphy, M., Scullard, G., Leen, C., & Reilly, G. (2006). A randomized comparative trial of tenofovir DF or abacavir as replacement for a thymidine analogue in persons with lipoatrophy. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000247574.33998.03
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.