The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is poverty or wealth driving HIV transmission?
Open accessAbstract
Evidence of associations between socioeconomic status and the spread of HIV in different settings and at various stages of the epidemic is still rudimentary. Few existing studies are able to track incidence and to control effectively for potentially confounding factors. This paper reviews the findings of recent studies, including several included in this volume, in an attempt to uncover the degree to which, and the pathways through which, wealth or poverty is driving transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. We investigate the question of whether the epidemic is transitioning from an early phase in which wealth was a primary driver, to one in which poverty is increasingly implicated. The paper concludes by demonstrating the complexity and context-specificity of associations and the critical influence of certain contextual factors such as location, gender and age asymmetries, the mobility of individuals, and the social ecology of HIV transmission. Whereas it is true that poor individuals and households are likely to be hit harder by the downstream impacts of AIDS, their chances of being exposed to HIV in the first place are not necessarily greater than wealthier individuals or households. What is clear is that approaches to HIV prevention need to cut across all socioeconomic strata of society and they need to be tailored to the specific drivers of transmission within different groups, with particular attention to the vulnerabilities faced by youth and women, and to the dynamic and contextual nature of the relationship between socioeconomic status and HIV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2626958 · Cited by 5,722
Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: An ecosocial perspective
Krieger, N. (2001) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/30.4.668 · Cited by 2,155 · cited 1×
“individual, household and neighbourhoods) [42,43] and through different causal pathways [44,45].”
BackgroundWeiser, S. D., Leiter, K., Bangsberg, D. R., Butler, L. M., Percy-de Korte, F., Hlanze, Z., Phaladze, N., Iacopino, V., & Heisler, M. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040260 · Cited by 378 · cited 7×
“In Botswana and Swaziland, food insufficiency among women was found to be significantly associated with inconsistent condom use with a non-primary partner (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.27–2.36), sex exchange (aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.74–1.93), intergenerational sexual relationships (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.03–2.08), and lack of control in…”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Cited by
Singer, M. (2011) · Annals of Anthropological Practice · doi:10.1111/j.2153-9588.2011.01064.x · Cited by 43
Steenkamp, L., Venter, D., Walsh, C., & Dana, P. (2014) · African Journal of AIDS Research · doi:10.2989/16085906.2014.952651 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillespie, S., Kadiyala, S., & Greener, R.
- Venue
- AIDS
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- Suppl 7
- Pages
- S5-S16
- ISSN
- 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022017568
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is poverty or wealth driving HIV transmission? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aids.0000300531.74730.72
- The paper
- Gillespie, S., Kadiyala, S., & Greener, R. (2007). Is poverty or wealth driving HIV transmission? AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000300531.74730.72
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.